SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bridge Player who wrote (7047)4/28/2000 9:32:00 PM
From: Poet  Respond to of 8096
 
Darn it, Bridge Player, you're absolutely right. Again. <g>



To: Bridge Player who wrote (7047)4/29/2000 4:57:00 AM
From: solihull  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8096
 
RE: QCOM Contrarian TA Opinion 4/28/00

FWIW: "On April 18, Qualcomm (QCOM - 108-7/16) reported second-quarter earnings of 26 cents per share, surpassing analysts' estimates by two cents per share...the stock has been trading sideways since the beginning of the year using the 105-110 area for support. The stock traded below the bottom of this range and hit a low at 98-1/16 the day before earnings were released. Since then, QCOM shares have continued to trade lower using their 10-day moving average for resistance (see the chart below). Today, this short-term trend line resides at the 110 mark. Coincidentally, today's intraday high on QCOM was exactly at 110, showing the continued resistance at this technical line.

"Another item of significance is the options resistance at the 110 strike. As of this morning, open interest on the May 110 call stood at 9,179 contracts. This is the site of the peak open interest within that series and across both call and put options. This strike is also seeing heavy volume today with nearly 1,201 contracts changing hands. The May 115 call is also attracting attention with 1,221 contracts trading so far today and open interest standing at 6,136.

"With this outstanding open interest and technical resistance ahead at the 110 strike, QCOM shares could continue to see weakness ahead. It will be important to note how the open interest volume from today translates into open interest on Monday. If we start seeing traders go to the bearish side amid a recovery in price action above the 110 mark, we could switch our view of the stock, becoming more bullish. However, for now the optimism in light of the stock's recent move despite better-than-expected earnings remains a slight concern."

Food for thought. Opinions? Personally, I don't follow TA too closely.

Thanks,

John



To: Bridge Player who wrote (7047)4/29/2000 1:09:00 PM
From: RocketMan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8096
 
IMO, I find this view to have more validity if one is buying companies with market caps of, say, 5-10 billion, than those with caps of over 50 billion. Certainly there are exceptions, but the continuation of rapid growth as the numbers get larger just becomes very difficult. Most of the really significant money in the market lies in buying successful companies before they get big.

Excellent point, Bridge. Here is an oversimplistic little model I ran for myself (aren't they all oversimplistic?).

Say your large cap has a probability of 0.6 of doubling in the "long term" (say, five years or so). Similarly, apply the following probabilities of it going to 4x, 10x, and 100x of .2, .1, and 0. Going the other way, give it a probability of 0.1 of going to 0 (not really zero, but enough so that your losses would be the equivalent of it going to zero, as happened to many in the recent market dive).

Now, for a small or mid-cap with a promising future, let's shift the probabilities towards the upper end, but also recognize that they have a larger chance of going to zero. I've used its probabilities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.2, and 0.1 of it going to 0,2,4,10, and 100. The 100 case would be the small cap (say, under $1B) becoming a large cap in the long term.

If you run those probabilities out, you find that your expected gain in the large cap is a respectable 3 (triple your money), but for the small/mid cap it is a life-changing 14. However, the variability (std deviation) for the large cap is 2.6 versus 28.8 for the small/mid cap.

So, this simple model supports your conclusion that on average one will make much more money by investing in small or mid caps, but should be ready to tolerate much wider swings, and there is a chance of losing all of one's money. I believe an example of this lesson was shown over the last two weeks.

As I said, one can change the numbers and run other scenarios, but for most reasonable distributions the chance of that small cap becoming a large cap will be the determining factor, and will not change the overall conclusion.

Based on this, and other lessons learned over the recent past, I have modified my investment philosophy somewhat. For options, I prefer to buy common and slightly OTM leaps for large caps, and large number of cheap way OTM calls on small caps, as far out as possible. I fully realize that most of the time these will expire worthless, but all I need is one horse to come in. It is gambling, no more, no less. But it is gambling with money I can afford to lose. In the meantime, my large caps will keep plowing ahead, but I don't expect to hit the jackpot with them. For that reason I also avoid deep ITM, since I believe it is equivalent to margin buying.

One other thing, in this current market I am mainly in cash until the Fed is done. The two prime directives are, Preserve Your Capital, and Don't Fight the Fed.