To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (3771 ) 4/29/2000 11:34:00 PM From: Marty R Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
OT-OT Mr. A@P. With all due respect (which I will extend to anyone despite how I may disagree with their opinion). You're a hypocrite. You were asked some direct questions and your responses were: <<If you want to pay 600 a month, then do your due diligence, but you shouldn't ask me..Im the worst source of information about me that there could ever be,, You should get your info ...from others and what you read for yourslef. Make up your own mind..I am way too biased for you to rely on.. That is Rule Number one in DD 101.>> and << IF he isnt going to respond, than we must assume he is hiding from tough questions, It really doesnt make sense to create a thread and then to just use it to serve ones self....at the expense of the public...>> and << It's 100% relevant, you question my reason to be here and my questions..and I have a reason and dozens and dozens of similair artciles I can plaster her showing what my "track record " is and what my credibility and history show..here on SI. I just used the most recent one...I am questioning Gilders relationships and "seeming" complete independant research..if its true or if it's false...I want to find out for myslef.....Arent I allowed todo that? Someone benfits by a 250% increase in the price of a stock when he mentions it...he says its not him ..I say ok Prove it, cause it doesnt make sense. So do everyone a favor and ..buzz off, since i doubt you can answer my questions >> How can you sit their demanding answers from Mr. Gilder and refuse to answer similar questions of you? If you applied your own rule 101 to others as you do to yourself you'd do your own DD, ask others. Perhaps, like you, GG is biased and isn't the best one to answer such questions about himself. And how do you define credibility? Is bilking an insurance company for money due to your inability to work while you've already taken on another job elsewhere credible?