Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (3773)	4/29/2000 11:52:00 PM
From: Marty R	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5853

Gee that's quite a number. You actually count your posts? If I understand what you're saying, as long as I'm totally honest on SI but I commit insurance fraud I'm to be considered a credible person?

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (3773)	4/30/2000 11:55:00 AM
From: saukriver	Respond to of 5853

<<"BUt since 1995 through today the US Govt..has said I have credibility and has used me as a credible witness in case after case. Ask them what their definition is, dont ask me." >> See 1997 settlement with the NASD Message 13528253 Note that the settling party does not DENY the allegations as part of the settlement. Were you the settling party? Appreciate my confusion with all the name you seem to use (Anthony, Steve Pulvia, etc.) saukriver

To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (3773)	4/30/2000 1:10:00 PM
From: Mr. Palau	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5853

Anthony, if I understand your reasoning, you have been indicted for fraud, and suspended by NASDAQ, but since have shown your good faith by turning state's evidence. Now I see. Until you subcribe to GG's newsletter, you don't have standing to demand that he do anything. If you do subscribe, you can participate in the GG Board, which GG contributes to frequently, and where he tirelessly answers questions from subscribers. GG's judgment on ascendent technology, and the companies who are in the best position to advance and benefit from that technology, has proven to be extraordinary. For example, if you would have invested in his recommended companies one year ago, you would have realized a return of 187%. hometown.aol.com. That is excellent by anyone's measure. And despite your innuendo to the contrary, there is no factual basis (as opposed to wild conjecture and speculation) for impugning his integrity. You have now more than earned addition to my list of ignored posters. Best of luck in your continued rehabilitation.