SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Tulipomania Blowoff Contest: Why and When will it end? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (2831)4/30/2000 5:23:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 3543
 
Interesting concept. But then, it looks more like a gag. Why won't I buy one of the classic microcap funds, or, if I'm so inclined, buy the stock?

ESOL, you say? I remember ESOL as a casino play in January which was good for the usual 100% jolts (like so many others), but the company stinks.
With negative operating CF for 2 years, a negative equity and still some intangibles to go (to write off). Why don't they buy one of the several internuts which trade at, or below cash, meanwhile and can easily turn around when they add a viable business.



To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (2831)4/30/2000 5:43:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3543
 
From the eRaider page,
>>>>>>>>>
Historical Performance of Funds

Historically, actively managed funds have consistently underperformed main indices such as the S&P 500. The Fund hopes to beat the Russell 2000 index but it may fail to do so.
<<<<<<<<<

Pure index trackers, like the Spiders don't underperform the corrresponding indices. To the hell with fund managers....


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News