Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chaz who wrote (23914)	4/30/2000 11:58:00 AM
From: Eric L	Respond to of 54805

Chaz << Chaz >> Whoops! Dang it. I did it AGAIN! I posted to Cha2 using Chaz ... so before he catches me, best I acknowledge it. Its bad enough that you LOOK alike ... gets worse when you follow the same subject. <g> As Cha2 knows, I have the same problem on the Cisco thread, where I am E2 and Eric is Eric. - E2 no Eric -

To: chaz who wrote (23914)	4/30/2000 4:43:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

chaz: Your decisions re buying or not buying are your business. Good luck. Since you are my namesake predecessor, I think I owe you some info as grist for your decision mill on WAP (and therefore perhaps - PHCM). Note well this from Eric L's post: "In some cases WML can carry the same piece of information as HTML, but using half the kilobytes." That one sentence speaks volumes. Nokia (a major WAP supplier) and other equipment suppliers who focus still on GSM find that WAP is an essential element in permitting GSM (through the GSM upgrade GPRS) to squeeze enough into its data provision (its speed) to serve some important data requirements. Qualcomm does not require that squeeze since both 1XRTT and HDR make that unnecessary. Also when (in 2 or 3 years or whenever) WCDMA sees the light of day, it may need WAP because of its ability to squeeze data (actually transmit less data to get the same message through). But Qualcomm's version of 3rd gen wireless does not need that squeeze. Therefore there is a huge and rapidly growing market for WAP whereever the GSMers are trying to keep their market. And BTW in Japan where there is a similar problem for everyone but DDI which uses Qualcomm's technology. In sum, the non Qualcomm world is heavily dependent on WAP for data purposes (less data transmitted for a similar use) over the next couple of years at least. This is a huge opportunity and a very very large potential market. Whether this affects PHCM is a separate point. But PHCM along with Nokia are major players in the WAP space. Best. Chaz PS Will be interested in Eric L's comments on this perception of mine, since I have great respect for him and look forward to his "take".