Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Computer Associates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Crystal ball who wrote (4236)	4/30/2000 2:58:00 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Respond to of 5232

did she? goodness, I'd hate to get on her bad side if those were insults and name calling. do something to make her mad, so we can see. we need a little fun around here. J

To: Crystal ball who wrote (4236)	5/6/2000 10:33:00 PM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5232

I most assuredly did not "name call." If you find a request for professionalism an "insult," then you have a problem that is of your own making. Valuation is customarily done against a "peer group" of companies. You do not offer a peer group for valuation purposes. Your postings throw a group of technology companies together that have nothing in common except their participation in a broad-brush industry group and then you use their valuations as support for a valuation of CA that is of your own imagination. Comparable companies are those in the system software space, such as BMCS and CPWR. Possibly also LGTO, VTRS, SSWR, et al. If insisting on a bit of intellectual discipline is insulting in your world, well, then, I think you should rethink your world rather than posting your daydreams on SI.