Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jimpit who wrote (3797)	4/30/2000 10:25:00 PM
From: chalu2	Respond to of 9127

Well, we can agree to disagree on this. In my opinion, Nixon was the worse because he appeared to stand for morality and strict adherence to the law, and when his crimes were uncovered, I'll grant that he did resign, but the damage he did to the institution of the Presidency has not yet been repaired. Indeed, Nixon may have laid the groundwork for Clinton, as the general public may now believe: "If you heard them scheming behind closed doors, you'd realize they're all crooks. Even Nixon--the last person we'd believe it of! So what's the difference what crook we elect?" The Nixon damage still echoes.