To: E who wrote (17869 ) 5/1/2000 1:24:00 PM From: PROLIFE Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
E, listen to yourself, I am going to have to put on my waders.I have only come in contact with the degree of incomprehension, and the kinds of cognitive difficulties that you manifest, in individuals who live in sheltered environments See? I can shorten that for you. Why don't you just say, "you are an idiot". You assume all this anyway,(are you a professional anything,(I mean besides being an antagonist) ?This is a literally true statement, heh heh heh, sort of hung up on yourself there E?If you are operating the computer on your own, probably you live independently. But something is very wrong. Nope, my better half is too busy flinging dirt in her beautiful Iris garden, but my Scottie helps me fire up the computer, since I could be "retarded", as you accuse in prior posts.( I won't tell you what he thinks) :o)and were yourself attempting to dupe and manipulate yep, that's me. In order to try and save lives ALL us Prolife folks are on the lying warpath.(unlike you choicers, wink wink). It is our aim in life to lie to you, according to you. Funny thing about that though. I NEVER see quotes from ProLife people going over to the Antilife side and quoting stuff like " Yeah after I saw that arm in the pan, I decided to become AntiLife".... By the same token, I DO see ProLife people condemning clinic bombing and abortionist killing? WHY?? duhhhhh......PROLIFE!!!!!!(Look how much effort it took to force you to concede that the pamphlet you quoted was a lying manipulation!) Back up the bus there. Who is manipulating now?? I NEVER conceded that the pamphlet was a lie. I conceded the 40 day point on the pamphlet.....tells me that you did not understand a very, very simple point, one a small child would be able to understand. nope, YOU are the one that missed the whole thing, go back and read a little. Michael said I was not a liar, and you tried to claim you did not say as much, narrowing your comments to one portion of one post. I only proved that you HAD called me a liar in another place. I really am not sure any more, Dan, what you are. I thought I had figured it out. But I'm not sure. I do know that the standards of truthfulness and decency that most people at least try to adhere to mean nothing at all to you. And you are either incapable of shame, or incapable of perceiving that it is called for in any given situation. LOL...get a grip, E. Is your life aim to "figure me out"? Is your own comprehension at such a level that you are the one to decide that I am not only retarded and/or a liar, now I am incapable of shame......shameful for what? I WILL tell YOU what I think incapable of shame is. Those who believe that a woman's personal freedom to use abortion as a method of contraception is more important than any life growing within, THOSE are the ones that seem incapable of any shame. Man or woman. So what the hell am I doing trying to figure you out, anyway? Geeez, wassup with that? The first good point you have made yet, E. Maybe there is hope for you after all... I have a good idea, but will close this post with this:"The greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion, which is war against the child. The mother doesn't learn to love, but kills to solve her own problems. Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want." Mother Teresa