Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : HITSGALORE.COM (HITT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (5526)	5/1/2000 12:52:00 AM
From: Q.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7056

Most of the soc. sec. nos. do not belong to dead people. I used ancestry.com to find whether any of those social security numbers were used by somebody who has been reported dead to the Social Security Administration. The one that starts out 426-64-XXXX belonged to an an elderly person named Collins who died in Mississippi in 1989. The other 5 complete numbers do not correspond to anybody who has been reported dead to the Social Security Administration. There's no reason to think that Mr. Collins is related to her; if you just change the first digit of the social security number you get one of the other numbers, issued in Arizona, that the bank says she's used.