SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pgerassi who wrote (108881)5/1/2000 3:00:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571957
 
Pete,
RE:"I think that the rules to stopping the actions of a monopoly should start at somewhere around 10 to 20 percent of any given market. Ideally, they should be banned at all times but, I understand why they are not."

I think you have way too much faith in any government to regulate such things and certainly in the agenda of Attorneys. If the government went after every standard that went past 20% of a market then I believe the dow and NASDAQ might not even exist. Basis of capitalism is growth through the raising of capital. In the case of public companies, through the issuing of stock. So who would every provide capital with the roadblock that if the company should gain 10%-20% market share the government would entangle them in a lawsuit? Perhaps I should remind you why communism/totalitarianism hasn't worked? Hint...no incentive, no innovation.

Jim



To: pgerassi who wrote (108881)5/1/2000 3:23:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571957
 
Pete, <Just throw it together, patch it till it works, and force you to buy it, by adding it to the OS or Office.>

Isn't this particular pattern an industry-wide problem, not just a Microsoft problem?

Tenchusatsu