Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (17904)	5/2/2000 12:47:00 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

I've made clear with whom I align myself, PROLIFE, and with whom I don't, so i can't help but wonder why you don't know that those questions are inappropriate and unwarranted. Did you not understand my posts on this subject? Is there some reason you would imply that my position that (early, pre-sentiency) abortion should be the woman's choice equates to my approving that women be given "no alternatives," and essentially forced into getting unwanted abortions? Do you think haqihana would agree that that is a fair representation of my position? Is there something in my position that early abortions should be legal that causes you to "bet" you "can guess" this is a "fashion statement"? I understand that as intended ridicule of me, but of what aspect of me? I live in jeans and a tee shirt, as a matter of fact. Do you think haqihana approves that incomprehensible insult? Do you think haqihana approves your implication that because I support the right of a woman to have an early abortion, perhaps I "align" myself with men who set fire to their pregnant girlfriends? Do you think these remarks about my position show an intelligent understanding of it? ? Does haqihana think so?