SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (109015)5/2/2000 1:56:00 AM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578134
 
Joe,

<That's a great prospect, isn't it? If this is the case, Sanders reluctance to commit to $100 ASP is a case of severe sandbagging.>

Yes, yes.

<Notice Osha's statement about discontinuation of Athlon wafers. I may be way off base, but my gut feeling is that this could mean an increase of ASP of at least $50, given K6 production is winding down / changing to slightly more expensive K6-2+. $50 increase in ASP is roughly $300 million, or almost $2 per share per quarter.>

The advantage of Thunderbird is the reduced cost and a slightly improved ASP because of the better MHz mix (I say slight because AMD will be unable to exploit the MHz mix until it gets a few business SKUs). The ASP growth will primarily from improving the K6/Athlon mix.

Nevertheless, I am not sure how you arrive at $50 increase in ASP but I see ASP of $100 +/- $5 for Q2 which would mean an increase in the $10-20 range. And, all of that ASP growth and a few additional dollars from the cost savings fall directly to the bottom line.

Chuck



To: Joe NYC who wrote (109015)5/2/2000 9:58:00 AM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578134
 
Why do you think K6-x+ is more expensive?.. I'd expect yields to be great as K6-iii+ that don't have good L2's will become K6-2+'s. Not to mention a continually shift to 180nm.

Milo