Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : DAYTRADING Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan Clark who wrote (8172)	5/2/2000 7:41:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18137

Dan, how would SuperSOES affect this? My understanding of the usefulness of this is: 1. Thin stock 2. A single MM is passively-agressively (hah!) going after the stock 3. Stocks have been observed to subsequently move up after this happens Assumption is that the MM is "quietly" filling a large order. Stock should move up until the order is filled. I don't think that SuperSOES would change any of this, would it? Or would the MM now be required to show their hand? I have to admit, I haven't throughly reviewed SuperSOES. There have been a whirlwind of proposals, and I haven't kept up. Is this the one where everybody gets thrown into one big queue? Would SNET still exist? Direct links from some brokers to ECNs? Anyway, what I posted was strictly about identifying a situation, not how one might execute a trade to implement a trading strategy.