Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (30702)	5/3/2000 9:36:00 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

I just think the bank account is dry. i think that MFunds got a wake up call in APRIl. They were caught with their pants down, and now wont be so fast to use their cash reserves.

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (30702)	5/3/2000 9:36:00 AM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42523

Currency crises are good for banks, yeah?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (30702)	5/3/2000 9:48:00 AM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42523

The incredible thing is that both AMG data and TrimTabs have reported continuing healthy inflows to funds all through this period of volatility. The flows are on the order of 10 billion dollars a week. As long as that keeps up, the fund managers, on average, can hold those razor-thin balances. There must be a lot of people still hooked on the idea that steady contributions to a retirement fund can ride out any and all market declines. I don't know what it will take to break that psychology, which has been so reinforced by the Fed in the last two years. I have often compared this situation to nineteenth-century banking in the US. People would put money into a bank, imagining that they would get a steady 6% return for the rest of their lives in a gold-backed currency (or at least in post-civil-war greenbacks), but then the bank loans would go bad, the bank would fail, and they would lose everything. I think a lot of the public imagine that there is some kind of implied backing to the stock market by the government. I have met people who think that "mutual fund" means some government-supported institution and imagine that they are much safer there than those who merely buy stocks. I think it will take an entire year of no-profit, or loss, to begin to shake loose this misplaced confidence. High interest rates on CDs might help it along--and once fund managers start liquidating to cover withdrawals, the decline will make April's slump look very small.