Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Corriente Resources V.CTQ Junior Exploration Co. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WillC who wrote (1380)	5/3/2000 1:16:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 1416

WillC, CTQ at $2.20 is not yet at the top of my list of favorites, but, given those results and the potential of what is head, it is certainly climbing very fast the latter. CC

To: WillC who wrote (1380)	5/3/2000 2:42:00 PM
From: Ontherise	Respond to of 1416

Will, Any comments on my previous post where I attempted to calculate the amount of copper in the supergene zone? I based it on the assumption that the copper would be where the high Mo concentrations are in the surface sampling map, which also seems to coincide with the drill results. Yes holes 11 and 12 had some copper, but they were the thinnest of the >1% bunch. And yes, 4 and 6 had low % Cu, but are in the red area. Still, I figured I was covered with my assumption of only a 30m thick layer. Better yet, lets get Lowell to explain why they drilled where they did, and not in the middle of the Mo anomaly. If a Mo anomaly is not a good indicator, then why use it as a map of the drill site? Having drill results, without the reasoning behind them, and the expectations, just serves to confuse the crap out of every one. I think I'll make this suggestion the next time I talk to Ken. Kevin