To: gdichaz who wrote (10008 ) 5/3/2000 8:11:00 PM From: Wyätt Gwyön Respond to of 24042
OT Chaz, let's let Gilder speak for himself. On the Gilder thread, in post #3785 I asked him:Were you in fact ignorant of: 1. The imminent end of lockup on insider sales of AVNX shares? 2. Of the fact that AVNX was, prior to your report, trading under the required share price for insiders to unload shares? 3. Of the likelihood that your recommendation would push the stock above the required minimum share price for the required number of days, thereby enabling insiders to unload shares? 4. Of the likelihood that AVNX insiders, anticipating the potential benefits of a strong recommendation in the GTR, could have been highly motivated to present their company in the best possible light? Message 13528609 And here is what his response was:Yes I am ignorant of these technicalities... siliconinvestor.com Ah yes, the good old technicality excuse! 25% of insider shares can flood the market today, a mere three months after the IPO (and even in this day and age, most companies have the decency to wait six months!), but it's a technicality! LOL And George hasn't even responded to Pat's post #3904 Message 13537724 , while totally sidestepping the serious issues brought up in her post #3730 ("I read all that stuff. It is irrelevant to their major invention..."). Meanwhile, chaz, your response to #3730 just says that you are "puzzled" without addressing any of the ten specific issues relating to AVNX Pat brought up in her post. Message 13521545 Basically, it looks to me like GG and his supporters don't want to talk substance. I would ask you, chaz, to review the exchange between Pat and GG, and think about who sounds more convincing based on FACTS.