Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Mohilner who wrote (12493)	5/4/2000 12:55:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Respond to of 18366

Gary, I haven't posted this before, but I'll say it now. MaryInRed may be paid for the kind of cheer-leading posting she does. If that's the case, she gets more for every response she gets. She has a right to post, but the more attention investors pay to her, perhaps the more she's paid. I hope you, and others, will consider that when you think about answering her posts. Jon

To: Gary Mohilner who wrote (12493)	5/4/2000 2:24:00 AM
From: cAPSLOCK	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18366

I know I've posted this before, but I'll repeat it. Jon Tara may be paid for the kind of negative posting he does. If that's the case, he gets more for every response he gets. He has a right to post, but the more attention investors pay to him, perhaps the more he's paid. I hope you, and others, will consider that when you think about answering his posts. That dubious and paranoid logic can be applied to everyone on this thread and all the others. Including those that are wildly long. They could be paid to do 'pr for edig' in the same way you suggest JT could be a paid 'basher'. But you are right in a way, and it is, in the final analysis each (wo)man for himself in this cuthroat world of markets. It has always been that way. The advent of internet stock bulletin boards only sped the hype up to the speed of light. while providing a convenient relative anonymity for those involved. The fact of the matter is JT offers the 'other side' to what has been a pretty much 'always on' positive side of the equation that existed here for years more or less. The attention EDIG has been shown in the media, and it's recent price spike justify this situation. I am frankly surprised it didn't get hotter. regards, cAPSLOCK