SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (109285)5/4/2000 1:11:00 AM
From: milo_morai  Respond to of 1578494
 
He was hard on Duron and T-bird, but was okay with Mustang.



To: Dan3 who wrote (109285)5/4/2000 1:33:00 AM
From: kapkan4u  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578494
 
<Whooeeee - editorial is right. That's one of the most spun pieces of writing I've ever seen. Not quite outright lies, but very close to the line. I wonder how much "support" he's been getting from Intel?>

Ha? The piece looks pretty accurate to me. What did you think was spun?

Kap



To: Dan3 who wrote (109285)5/4/2000 2:01:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578494
 
Dan3, re:<Not quite outright lies, but very close to the line. I wonder how much "support" he's been getting from Intel?>

I believe BapCo Sysmark 2000 may backfire on Intel badly. Judging by the way it seems to love fast L2's, Duron and TBird may both move ahead of Coppermine and leave Celeron II, overclocked or not, in the dust.

Petz


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News