Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JC Jaros who wrote (44240)	5/4/2000 2:30:00 AM
From: Charles Tutt	Respond to of 74651

funny how that works <g>

To: JC Jaros who wrote (44240)	5/4/2000 2:55:00 AM
From: TTOSBT	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

Re: "under the statute and it's expert shareholders started whining and ranting about how it all <yawn> didn't apply to them, and that they were victims of political persecution. -JCJ" I was pissed but not as a MSFT shareholder but as an American! I don't feel persecuted but I do feel shame as an American! And I feel cheated but not only as an American but also as a democrat! Didn't you listen to Klein's answers to the weak questions of the reporters when he said "because that's what we think is the best solution" etc.etc. Your glaring premature gloat is obviously from your love of SUNW I surmise. TTOSBT

To: JC Jaros who wrote (44240)	5/4/2000 12:29:00 PM
From: Daniel W. Koehler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

JC Let's see Jaros. You're an environmentalist, an investor in Sun,a musician with a keen interest in the ongoing debate on the relative merits of Korg versus Yamaha synths and now an expert on the antitrust laws. I feel obliged to fill in the blank JC Jaros profile based on reading your prior posts since you don't deign to disport your qualifications to the thread. It's all about credibility on SI and until you disclose what you do, I will discount your posts as irrelevant, as I am sure other will as well. Daniel

To: JC Jaros who wrote (44240)	5/4/2000 12:43:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

You know, I personally didn't hear anything about this overwhelming and ongoing debate until (coincidentally) a public corporation was found guilty under the statute and it's expert shareholders started whining and ranting about how it all <yawn> didn't apply to them, and that they were victims of political persecution. -JCJ I didn't see much debate about the immigration policy toward Cuba until a key event (coincidentally) happened there either. Just because nothing has yet triggered a debate on the topic doesn't mean a debate isn't warranted.