Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (4247)	5/4/2000 10:30:00 AM
From: The Barracuda™	Respond to of 9127

Elian: The Individual vs. The Collective April 12, 2000 MARINA DEL REY, CA ? The plight of Elian Gonzalez is an American issue not just a Cuban-American one, said a spokesperson for the Ayn Rand Institute. ?Elian?s case is fundamentally the conflict between the individual and the collective,? said Amy Peikoff, J.D. ?Cuba, led by Castro, insists that Elian belongs to the people and the state; the United States, by contrast, is based on the supremacy of the individual. This is why Elian should stay in America: he will be free here ? free to exercise his fundamental rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.? Peikoff said that the ?parental rights? of Elian?s father are non-existent. ?In Cuba, there are no parental or other rights,? said Peikoff. ?The only issue that should matter to the courts is whether or not Elian will be free to live his life ? whether life in Cuba is harmful to his development. How can anyone consider returning a boy to a country that explicitly abrogates individual rights and punishes independent thought?? Peikoff argued that the outcome of Elian?s case should be of paramount importance for every American no matter what their race, ethnic origin or political affiliation. ?If the courts send Elian back to Cuba, it will be a slap in the face to every American living or dead ? a repudiation of the very principles upon which this country was founded,? she said. Recently Peikoff accompanied Walter Polovchak, the world?s youngest defector, to a meeting with Elian Gonzalez. She is the author of a ?friend of the court? brief defending Elian?s right to remain in the United States. Ayn Rand Institute spokesperson Amy Peikoff is available for interviews. The Ayn Rand Institute, an educational organization established in 1985, seeks to advance novelist-philosopher Ayn Rand?s philosophy of Objectivism and its principal tenets: reason, rational egoism, and laissez-faire capitalism. For further information, contact Chris Wolski, Media Relations Manager. Phone: (310) 306-9232 Ext. 213; fax (310) 306-4925; e-mail: chrisw@aynrand.org or visit ARI?s Web site at: aynrand.org

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (4247)	5/4/2000 10:36:00 AM
From: Rambi	Respond to of 9127

Good work! You are an excellent cut and paster! But I am not really that impressed with Peikoff, whom Rand had to whip into submission whenever he strayed from the true path. Rand insisted on absolute allegiance to her beliefs and brooked no independent thought or argument from her followers. She would be proud of you, I think.

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (4247)	5/4/2000 10:39:00 AM
From: average joe	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 9127

Bambi might never understand the following: "My philosophy, in essence, is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as his only absolute. Ayn Rand"

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (4247)	5/4/2000 10:43:00 AM
From: jhild	Respond to of 9127

I see that the Department of Justice spent about $200,000 rescuing Elian from Little Havana. At around 200,000,000 in the US that works out to about $.001 per person. I don't know about you, but I sure felt like I got my money's worth. Where else can you contribute to reuniting a father and a son for Easter, saving him from the clutches of the political and fortune hunting opportunists for a slim 1/10th of a penny?

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (4247)	5/4/2000 10:46:00 AM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

That says it all for me. That is magnificent! jewishworldreview.com In Clinton and Castro's best interests jewishworldreview.com -- WHY WAS THE GOVERNMENT in such a rush to send a SWAT team to drag a 6-year-old Cuban boy out of the house of his relatives? Miami lawyer Aaron Podhurst, a 30-year friend of Janet Reno, was mediating between her and Elian's lawyers moments before INS agents, with their submachine guns, broke in the door. "I'm gravely disappointed," he told the Wall Street Journal, "that the government had to use force when I think we could have worked things out." In the Miami Herald, Podhurst described himself as having been "devastated" at this breach of trust. The first reason for Janet Reno's brutal application of her version of the rule of law was explained by Richard Nuccio on the Fox television network the day of the raid. A former point man on Cuban affairs at the State Department, he was Clinton's adviser on dealing with Castro. Nuccio pointed out, as have others, that at first the INS decided that Elian's case should go to a state family court in Florida. But the State Department summarily reversed that ruling, ordering the INS to hold the boy. The Clinton administration, as Nuccio notes, was reacting to a threatening speech in Havana by Ricardo Alarcon, head of the Cuban National Assembly. Alarcon, who is close to Castro, said that if the boy were not returned to Cuba, there would again be massive boatlifts from Cuba to America. Clinton well remembers the 1980 Mariel boatlift, which brought 125,266 Cubans to the United States. Some of them were among the most remorseless criminals our law-enforcement officers have ever had to deal with. Among them were Cubans held in an Arkansas detention center who rioted, thereby helping to give Clinton his only defeat in a gubernatorial election. The president has not forgotten that rare rejection by the electorate. More to the immediate point, he fears that more waves of Cuban immigrants this summer might affect the November elections, thereby reducing his chances of bolstering his legacy by transferring the presidency to Al Gore, and perhaps having the Democratic Party take Congress. Another reason for the SWAT team to terrorize Elian and the family, kick an NBC cameraman in the stomach, and snatch the boy from the fisherman who rescued him from the sea has to do with the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. That court had announced a hearing on the boy's claim of asylum -- filed by his great-uncle and also signed by him -- to be held May 11, only 19 days after the April 22 raid. What was the administration afraid of? On April 19, when setting the date for the hearing, the court said that the application for asylum "presented a substantial case on the merits." The day after the boy was snatched on April 22, the Justice Department rushed custody papers to Elian's father, Juan Miguel Gonzalez, which he signed. It is the desire and hope of the Clinton administration that the Appeals Court moot the asylum case, dismissing it. Then Elian can be whisked back to Cuba so that his "re-education" can begin. On April 18, The New York Times reported that Elian's father's family has been moved to a state-owned house that will also function as a school for Elian and "12 classmates, relatives, doctors and psychologists." The boy, said a Cuban psychologist, needs time to "readjust." One book that Elian will certainly not be permitted to read, as he grows up a child of the state, is George Orwell's "1984." Meanwhile, after being returned to his father by Janet Reno, Bill Clinton and the INS -- a move described by Fidel Castro on Cuban television as "doing the right thing" -- he will have been given preliminary re-education by his father and attendant Cuban officials. Clinton also said that Reno had done "the right thing." By the time the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals holds the hearing, his father can tell the court that Elian has renounced his personally signed application for asylum. A footnote to the Clinton-Reno interpretation of the rule of law was the attempt by Elian's father's attorney, Gregory Craig -- formerly on Clinton's impeachment team -- to get the heads of all the news networks to censor photographs of the raid. He sent that letter two days before the taking of the boy. Craig said that releasing the pictures would be "exploitative" of the child. Craig's scorning of the First Amendment was intended to make a cover-up of the raid easier. Like Clinton, Reno and Castro, Craig, of course, had the best interests of the child at heart. JWR contributor Nat Hentoff is a First Amendment authority and author of numerous books. Send your comments to him by clicking here.

To: The Barracuda™ who wrote (4247)	5/4/2000 11:10:00 AM
From: Master (Hijacked)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

"..."Only Ayn Rand defends the independence of the individual and the supremacy of his reason against all comers, whether 'friend' or enemy, father or stranger, state or church...." This sounds like some kind of Sect brainwashing bull$hit to me. Only Ayn knows what's good for me... Only Ayn knows what's good for me... Only Ayn knows what's good for me... Only Ayn knows what's good for me... Only Ayn knows what's good for me... Only Ayn knows what's good for me... Ohhhh, thank you Lord Leonard Jerkoff