SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Dorsey Wright & Associates. Point and Figure -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommy Dorsey who wrote (7674)5/4/2000 2:58:00 PM
From: demigh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9427
 
Thanks Tommy. After posting my question, I decided to get off my duff and try to find the answer for myself. For anyone who might be interested, the info is available here:

stls.frb.org

For the period 3/98-3/99 M3 increased by 537.52 billion, so it appears the rate of increase is slightly less. I don't know if that's significant, but there you have it. I still don't understand why the FED would increase money supply and interest rates at the same time. It seems contradictory to me--any comments?

Diane



To: Tommy Dorsey who wrote (7674)5/5/2000 12:04:00 PM
From: Ms. X  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9427
 
Tommy,

In a market such as this, I'd imagine that covered call writing would be good. Perhaps as a trade if the premium is right, one could buy a stock - write a call with the expectation of it being called?

This market is sideways and it seems covered writing works well in sideways markets. Any thoughts?

Bo bannis


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News