To: Bobby Berry who wrote (6303 ) 5/5/2000 11:12:00 PM From: jmhollen Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7209
One would sure as hell hope so. With the import and export licenses, it certainly sounds like an appropriate place for LGOV to be represented. Dusty managed to stuff most of the China reference links I have provided here on SI into the LGOV website offerings, during her little forays into HTML experimentation. You'd think maybe they'd actually read some of them themselves, once in a while. After 40+ years, the event sure as stink was no big surprise to anybody. It will really be a treat when the professionally developed SENTIO website is opened up to the public. Some similar sites are using ColdFusion, and other development tools, to do some really great presentations. The current patchwork quilt of radio-buttoned hyperlinks to artless verbiage and grainy photos looks like the offering one would generally expect for a nickle-dime Chinese restaurant. It would sure be fun to be a mouse in the corner, when what's-her-face at the SEC finally gets so exasperated at having to teach "..Manana's.." so-called consultants how to do their job - that she approves the SOB out of pure frustration; just to get it out of her face. I imagine that's what they are all desperately hoping for, as well. Beats having to prove that you can actually do what you claim and bill for. It will also be very interesting to find out, at the next shareholder's meeting, just how much money was flushed down the crapper for this SEC approval circus ; as opposed to one flat fee and successful 1st-time filing provided by KPMG, Arthur Andersen, etc. I'd certainly second a motion to deduct the difference from "...Manana's..." salary or bonus program. If you can't produce, you sure as hell ought to be willing to defray the excess costs out of your cut of the gimme-shares cake. John