Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (25802)	5/5/2000 11:27:00 AM
From: Tom Esau	Respond to of 26850

i voted the same way "NO"

To: ddl who wrote (25802)	5/5/2000 1:01:00 PM
From: Lorne	Respond to of 26850

ddl - RT et al would all be happy if they could only do away with the irritation of the minority shareholders. I still believe that the stock will do OK for us though we can forget the teevee, drunken Bilecki, Red, etc. pie in the sky prices. There is almost always a lull in stock prices at this point in the game and WSP looks to be in line with what usually happens as far as I can see.

To: ddl who wrote (25802)	5/5/2000 2:00:00 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

ddl, Anyways, my vote is a LOUD NO to the 45MM shares! I would rather RT ask for those shares when he can tell the shareholders why he wants them, then call a special meeting for approval. Regarding the approval sought for issuing an additional 45 million shares without further shareholder approval, I voted against it. I am not against eventually issuing another 45 million shares, however, IMO, any proposed equity financing that entails issueing more than 25% of the share capitalization should first be presented to the shareholders for consideration and then be voted on by all the shareholders, especially at this stage of the game. The existing requirement for a special shareholder's meeting to approve increasing the share capitalization by more than 25% at any one time is not going to kill any substantive deal. Shareholders are stakeholders entitled to vote on such proposals. regards, teevee