SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (109505)5/5/2000 11:06:00 PM
From: eplace  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578452
 
TENCH...re:If Intel's assumptions are right, Duron will have a hard time competing against Timna in that market. (Duron will probably be successful among customers who care more about performance than Timna's customers.)

Tenchusatsu

This sounds like a really silly argument coming from a smart guy like you Tench. I mean who doesn't care about performance and what makes you think Timna will be less expensive. By the time Timna shows up, Duron should be well entrenched in the value market and prices should be at very reasonable levels.
Ed P.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (109505)5/6/2000 1:55:00 AM
From: Charles R  Respond to of 1578452
 
Tenchusatstu,

<If Intel's assumptions are right, Duron will have a hard time competing against Timna in that market. >

The only problem for Intel is that Timna and Spitfire may not compete in the same market - at least for 2000 anyway. The best I can tell the max speed PIII *may* be able to get to in 2000 is 1.2GHz. There **almost** nothing stopping AMD from moving Spitfire to that frequency range by the end of the year. I doubt if Timna will even get to 1GHz this year. May be more like 800MHz. What is your take?

Unless, Intel kills the whole mid-range pricing and prices the entire PIII line at sub $200 Spitfire will rule the low-end. And infrastructure for Spitfire seems to be reasonably in line with AMD's 750 chipset and VIA's KZ133 and the upcoming integrated graphics chipsets. Do you see this differently?

The only real risk to AMD on Spitfires is ASPs. Even that could happen only if the capacity gets ahead of demand. Which is not looking like a major threat right now.

Chuck