SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandeep who wrote (44403)5/6/2000 10:03:00 AM
From: SunSpot  Respond to of 74651
 
How much functionality does your e-mail system have, if you cannot double-click icons without checking its validity first? Doesn't seems like something I would deploy on a large scale.

I can double-click everything and look at it without having any problems whatsoever. And no virus-write will ever crack this system. Ever.

Full e-mail functionality for me means:

- Ability to view and store all files I receive, without fearing virus'es etc.
- Ability to send all kinds of files.
- Managing e-mail addresses in various.
- Being able to use e-mail to manage and transmit confidential messages without fearing that other users on the same computer or on the internet can read my address book or e-mails.

What more do you need?

Our customers are happy that they are not vulnerable to viruses in e-mails.



To: sandeep who wrote (44403)5/6/2000 12:17:00 PM
From: ProDeath  Respond to of 74651
 
To lay off the inherent lack of security in Microsoft's 1980s-standalone-mindset software on mail servers and dumb users is the worse sort of nonsense, and holds the potential for abuse of hapless users who have idiot sysadmins who subscribe to such nonsense.

There are existence proofs that it is technically feasible to secure at the point of infection, for example the Java sandbox. After all, the infection may not arrive by mail. If you want to solve the problem, go to the source.



To: sandeep who wrote (44403)5/7/2000 5:23:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
So if instead of ILOVEYOU it was entitled "Could you please comment on the attached document?" and appeared to come from your boss, then it SHOULD be allowed to destroy whatever files it liked if you were "stupid" enough to click on it?

JMHO.