SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (18352)5/7/2000 1:21:00 AM
From: Chris land  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Now E. put that pick and shovel back because whenever we go digging for facts we always have a tendency to find exactly what we're hunting for.

Reminds me of the man who dug up a pigs tooth and created the missing link out of it.

BTW, could you say "hi" to your friend Sherry for me, we are not on the best of terms (um... her terms)lately.

Chris



To: E who wrote (18352)5/7/2000 5:03:00 PM
From: haqihana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
E, You know, perfectly well, that what you constantly do is err. It's easy to see if your reading is not of a, particularly, narrow scope. If you call pointing out a reason that you are wrong, bragging, then so be it. Calling all of my friends, and me collectively, "unintelligent" is just a bit more that an implication.

OH yes, the insults, on my part, were most sincere, and I 'fess up to all of them. Insults are derived from strong negative opinions. If I wanted to take the time, I could go back and copy all of the times you have insulted me, with words like "thug", etc. but, unlike you, I do not insult the intelligence of others. They have read what you have said, and what I have said, so to repeat it for them, is like calling them too stupid to have read them for themselves. I give them more credit than you do. There is also, no need to point out a single incident of you acting snobbishly. Just the fact that you consider all others unable to read, and comprehend, for themselves, is a perfect example of what I am saying. If one takes the context of a number of your posts, your air of superiority is very easy for any one to see.

If you were knowledgeable about some of the things you assume, you would know that those that came to support my position, and I , are hardly a gang. It is very seldom that we spend much time on the same threads, and, even then, do not post to each other very often. It is only when they, as well as I, see someone trying to "lord" it over another, that we step in and reunite as allies. If the U.S.A, Britain, France, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc., in WW2 were a gang, in your opinion, then, and only then, will I plead guilty.

I will be happy to keep quiet, but in order to do so, a plan will need to be worked out so that neither of us has the last word. ~H~