Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack Whitley who wrote (22130)	5/7/2000 1:34:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Respond to of 25814

jack, fwiw I'm responding to posts by Dipy. I didn't bring up CSCO here - Dipy did - I started nothing. Perhaps he should take this discussion to the CSCO thread. Furthermore I'm am long NT and LU as well as the entire infrastrucutre sector- including starups like JNPR and FDRY so while I a bullish on CSCO I am also bullish on others. So biased - perhaps - but on the sector as a whole. Non-relavent posts??? really? Is that what you consider this discussion??? Then what is relavent? Not sure where you get the idea I work for CSCO but I'll take that as a compliment. OG

To: Jack Whitley who wrote (22130)	5/7/2000 5:03:00 PM
From: Tony Viola	Respond to of 25814

Jack, I have to back up Gary as being a fair guy WRT Cisco, or any other company discussions. I didn't even know he is a Cisco employee (is he?). He did start responding to others' Cisco banter (seems they're the company du jour every day lately). He didn't bring it in here. If you're familiar with individual SI threads, they do often get "OT" in greater than 50% of posts for a while, but they generally come back to the source. The LSI thread can get boring anyway, can use a little foreign juice. Tony