Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : ET and the Rest -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Esway who wrote (17)	5/8/2000 3:13:00 PM
From: lorrie coey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5459

The 'agendas' seem quite transparent, imo... A stock with a low PE ratio shows strength and would be seen as more desirable than a stock with a high PE ratio, in a VALUE aware market...yes?

To: Esway who wrote (17)	5/8/2000 3:45:00 PM
From: thinkbach	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5459

OT: I don't mind bashers so much as I have problems with toxic language, in word use as well as tones. I welcome a board where distinctions are made between opinions and attacks. Unfortunately SI does not appear to make the same level of distinctions I do, and as some others apparently do. We grow up being told that words cannot hurt us, but for me I find it is not true. Words and certain kinds of word usage are damaging and toxic. Who can base a sound investment decision on some of the vituperative goings on in some of these threads? However, I do love opposing points of view, whether systematic or well-thought out, or otherwise, as long as the vehicule to present any view is more or less respectful of others, I say bring it on. Just leave the nastiness, the derogatory tones and namecalling at the door. If this makes me thin-skinned, then so be it. I claim my right of choice :) As it is, until spy and ecommerceman and all the rest migrate most of their energies over to this board, I will still need to read and post at both...