Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: trendmastr who wrote (26792)	5/8/2000 7:03:00 PM
From: George Dawson	Respond to of 29386

Greenberg's column continues to be rhetorical at best: He has said that the short sellers he depends on for their "excellent DD" don't see any value in Ancor, when in fact one of the existing and profitable FC companies finds it valuable. So much for their weak argument. The problem with his information of course is that it is not based on the actual merit of the company - it is based solely on the trading dynamics of the stock. Trading dynamics that can be affected by hedge funds and short sellers, which coincidentally he uses for his research. It is also based solely on the opinions of people who don't know anything about technology. This argument has no merit. His comments about Intel's investment also lack merit. If he is suggesting that the short sellers he talks with will start shorting QLGC - that could get interesting. Maybe Herb can tell us all why this may not be a good idea? Maybe Herb can tell us why the Learning Company and Mattel really aren't like Ancor and QLogic? I won't hold my breath waiting for the answers. George