Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greedsgd_2000 who wrote (4158)	5/9/2000 1:59:00 AM
From: feminvstr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5853

"Gilder, despite being imperfect, has developed a world class expertise in his area, and no amount of nitpicking is going to take that away." Here here! Kimberly

To: greedsgd_2000 who wrote (4158)	5/9/2000 8:51:00 AM
From: Charlie Smith	Respond to of 5853

Anyone can rattle off already disclosed "Risk Factors", add in some bean counting, and rip a company to bits, people with those talents are a dime a dozen. Folks with portfolios loaded with names made up of nothing more than hot air at the end of February might disagree. Bean counters were in very short supply at that point.

To: greedsgd_2000 who wrote (4158)	5/9/2000 10:01:00 AM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5853

I don't think calling Pat a myopic beancounter is fair. Pat has a valuable talent which we should make the most of - so long as she is willing to share. Just as there is an appropriate way to use GG's work there is an appropriate way to use Pat's. People are wired quite differently and thus take a passionate interest in quite different aspects of things. The key is for each type of perceiver to be employed in the most useful way. Let's end the feud, accept the strengths and weaknesses of each and concentrate on (but not ignore) the strengths.