Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SBerglowe who wrote (31880)	5/9/2000 2:13:00 PM
From: Tim McCormick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

Your idea will be fine when POS prints $2.

To: SBerglowe who wrote (31880)	5/9/2000 2:14:00 PM
From: John Graybill	Respond to of 42523

Yep, forget it! Make it POS6 or something like that, even RMBS isn't worthy of dethroning it.

To: SBerglowe who wrote (31880)	5/9/2000 2:15:00 PM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

I would support POS designation for MER. I think we're up to #6..

To: SBerglowe who wrote (31880)	5/9/2000 2:31:00 PM
From: Alias Shrugged	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 42523

In order for MER to be THE POS, as opposed to POS6 or some such, you would need to submit sufficent documentation to the POS Committee, which would include but not be limited to: (1) Inexplicable price movements during options expiration week; (2) Egregious tape painting [minimum movement - plus or minus 5 points on 100 share trade]; (3) Significant losses relating to put purchases, spread over several expirations and involving at least 5 other thread members; (4) Delayed NYSE opening at least 5 times a month; and finally, most important; (5) A history of touting on BubbleVision by the one and only Maria. As you can see, its a standard few stocks can measure up to.