Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (71681)	5/9/2000 4:52:00 PM
From: jmanvegas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

DH: I'm Alfred E. Newman in disguise - what me worry? When I particularly start to worry about your statements, then I'm off to the psychotic ward. When you attack me for spreading FUD as you have done in the past, then you are on patrol. Your statements on this thread for the last 5 months have been wrong, incorrect, imprecise, arrogant, and quite defensive. You are defending against everything and anything stated in a negative tone about QCOM and its downward stock movement. QCOM has been struggling out of the gate this year since Jan 2 even as the Naz climbed to over 5000. But your viewpoint is okay with me - it's your viewpoint and your right to state it. I'm entitled to mine and NOBODY here has to pay heed to anyone, especially mine. Maybe it's your ulcers that are bothering you or you're just an anal-like attack dog in disguise. jmanvegas (not a member of the close-knit QCOM club and glad of it - isn't independent thought just wonderful)