SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (41919)5/10/2000 12:29:00 AM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 93625
 
still want to see a PSII royalty projection in $.

Can someone take a stab at 110 million units * .02 of ???
Multiply by 2 as PSII has two chips.



To: mishedlo who wrote (41919)5/10/2000 1:40:00 AM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 93625
 
Hi mishedlo; You wrote: "Once again bilow you are talking 3 months out. What is it with you guys anyway? DDR is always so so far off. Where is that motherboard? How far off is it? Next year? Two years from now, or NEVER?"

This would possibly imply that my predictions for the big moment of truth for Rambus vs DDR have been slipping month for month. So I went back to late last year to see what I actually was saying 6 months ago. In short, my schedule hasn't slipped. It's just that it takes time for the industry to produce products. It is very obvious to design engineers what next year's products are going to be like, just as it is obvious to fashion designers what next year's coats are going to be colored. It's the general public that finds out late, not the designers.

So here are some dated quotes from me on this thread:

November 26, 1999
Sales of memory in 2001 are largely determined by design wins in 1999. Rambus died in mid 1999. You won't see product from early 1999 design wins until 2000, so you will see new products coming out that use Rambus. But that is a lagging indicator. The leading indicator is what design engineers are doing right now, and they know that Rambus is dead. Nintendo is just the tip of the iceberg. The vast majority of memory design wins go unmentioned in the press. The loss of the most important Rambus customer should indicate to even the most hopeful long that the technology is dead. You'll see the DDR-II when the design wins it is picking up start shipping.
#reply-12107435

November 29, 1999
The Hyundai guy is speaking the truth. Memory is going over to DDR. Intel lost. Rambus is quite dead. The company will remain, but the royalties are going to dry up, probably within 5 years, though the trend will be quite obvious by the end of next year,[i.e. end of 2000]
#reply-12138310

December 17, 1999
Hi dpk; As long readers of this thread are no doubt well aware, I believe that Rambus, as a dynamic technology for the future is dead, dead, dead. In fact, I've posted to that effect many times, complete with extensive links to articles in EE-Times. I still think that the technology isn't getting much in the way of new design wins (which is distinct from design win announcements, in that design wins come first), all we see now are the spasmodic involuntary movements of the technology's death throes. I know that memory designers are running away from this technology about as fast as they can, and I base my knowledge of the subject on the fact that I design memory for a living (when I'm not trading).
#reply-12314399

December 21, 1999
I am not saying that there will be no shipments of product containing it. What I am saying is that new design wins are not happening. I am not saying that the manufacturers have stopped pushing the technology, only that the design engineers are not seriously considering it anymore.
#reply-12345679

December 29, 1999
Thanks for the wish for savory satisfaction, I have already taken a good bit of it, and I expect to get a good bit more of it by this next summer [i.e. summer 2000]
...
[Re graphics] But new design wins in that market are going to specialized application specific DRAMs such as 32-bit wide DDR SDRAMs. Rambus is frozen out of that industry.
#reply-12404040

Another note on the situation in graphics from some time ago:

November 26, 1999
Re graphics memory requirements... I would think that the Rambus people would let this sleeping dog lie, given that the DDR x32 SGRAMs, along with embedded, have pretty much cleaned Rambus out of new design wins in this area for some time.
#reply-12119404

I have a pretty good view into that part of the industry where the rubber actually meets the road, as far as memory designs go, and my schedules aren't slipping badly.

I know that there are some jokers out there who have claimed that DDR machines would be shipping in January 2000, but I wasn't one of them. The fact is that prototype DDR machines have been around for some time, but that is always an advance indicator of possible production, not a coincident one. (Think how long prototype RDRAM machines were being demonstrated before you could buy one.)

In fact, I am back on this thread largely for the simple reason that the future I predicted late last year is going to be coming soon, and it will be fun to watch it from a front row seat.

-- Carl