Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nimbus who wrote (13665)	5/10/2000 12:38:00 PM
From: James M. Bash	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21142

Right Tommy, that's why Time Warner, Cox, Comcast, Excite@Home, Intertainer, Alcatel, and the others have all shunned Concurrent like the plague and instead bought nCube machines like they're going out of style. Thank God they all agree with you. As usual, you talk a lot of sh*t, trying to come off like you know something, but bottom line is your rap is the same-old-same-old, as it has always been. Go back to lurking, where you belong. But thanks for the occasional contrary indicator!

To: Nimbus who wrote (13665)	5/10/2000 6:06:00 PM
From: Gregory Rasp	Respond to of 21142

nCUBE single machines can do 132 gigabits/sec today. Can you elaborate on this comment. Are you saying that nCUBE can send 132 G/sec? Exactly what medium can handle that output? GR

To: Nimbus who wrote (13665)	5/19/2000 1:31:00 PM
From: Gregory Rasp	Respond to of 21142

tmrent wrote this claim of needing a lot more storage for a CCUR device than for the competition. I asked him about it and he did not respond. The more I think about it, the more I think he is wrong. It seems that he is assuming that each filer is accessing its own dedicated storage machine. My very limited understanding of storage indicates that this is not a proper model. Rather many filers would share data in a distributed model. With that model, the storage requirements would be the same regardless of how many filers were needed to distribute data streams. The folks on the NTAP (Network Appliance) or EMC threads could probably elaborate more than I can. GR