SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bear Down who wrote (4194)5/10/2000 6:29:00 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Respond to of 5853
 
<keep in mind the stock dropped 100 points after his sell rec.>

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc? Eh, Boobie?



To: Bear Down who wrote (4194)5/10/2000 9:53:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 5853
 
LOL, No, it wasn't "prudent" when it contained a lie...and NO, the it wasn't even prudent per price, since the stock didn't fall 100 points after he first posted the Fraudulent information I'm talking about. It rose up to 45 points or 50 percent, in fact.

Shucks, foiled again, eh? There are excellent odds Pluvia was intending to buy into that fraudulent sell reco's effects- as the stock had already fallen 100 points. I guess it didn't work as planned. Darn.

Dan B.