SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TGPTNDR who wrote (110285)5/10/2000 11:58:00 PM
From: minnow68  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579772
 
You wrote "FLASH* is dead, just that NAND usage for Camera flash is(IMO)."

Last I saw, those neat 340 MB hard drives cost about $500. Surely these small hard drives might make a big splash in the high end digital cameras, but they cost too much for the vast majority of digital camera users.

Mike



To: TGPTNDR who wrote (110285)5/11/2000 9:14:00 AM
From: that_crazy_doug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579772
 
<< Cameras are memory hogs. Cell phones & MP3 players aren't. >>

Per item, I think MP3 players are huge memory hogs compared to cameras. Typical MP3 player has 64 meg of ram, and would have more if there were bigger flash chips. I haven't checked out digital cameras in awhile, but I thought they were between 8-32M.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News