Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (35175)	5/11/2000 7:33:00 AM
From: Pink Minion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

The Clinton-Greenspan era is still here and I do not think that many can say that they look at their portfolios and see enormous shareholder value. Do you live in a Cave? The threads you follow put you in MSFT, INTC, JDSU, EMC, CSCO, SUNW, and QCOM. If you bought a 100 shares of each in 1993, you would be a very rich man. I think you bought last month. MH

To: Frank Ellis Morris who wrote (35175)	5/11/2000 1:48:00 PM
From: Fred Levine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

Frank-- I apologize for confusing you with facts. I know the FACT that the market has performed well under Clinton does not fit with your preconceived notions. As I said in a previous post, the market is complicated and has multiple masters, among whom are both anxious and greedy investors. However, if you simplistically blame Clinton for the decline, the same dumb logic should credit him for the raise. I don't think your posts add squat, nor do my last one's. fred