Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chaz who wrote (24572)	5/11/2000 4:19:00 PM
From: shamsaee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 54805

We probably see things different.I would have never known about TDMA and GSM had I not been a investor in qcom.Maybe I am wrong but,I do not remember reading TDMA inside when that was the standard technology in the US. I don't think qcom is concerned about having their name on a phone but rather being a technology pool for the wireless industry.If they wanted to go that route they would have kept their handset division. I think as an investor in the company,I am better served if the management puts their dollars into becoming a GSM/CDMA/WCMA asics provider and let the service providers advertise their technology and pros and cons.At the end of the day it is the carriers,who have to sell to the customers their service.It is their responsibility to highlight/advertise their superior service features i.e CDMA.