Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (12641)	5/12/2000 1:12:00 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 29986

I'll make it simple no more than 60,000 phones have been delivered to GSTRF as of yesterday, confirmed BY LOR and of thise they refuse to say are actually in service My guess is about 2,000-5,000 at the most and usage of 5 hours per average customer for the one month would give us rougly 1500 subscribers at most...... The bottom line is they wil not have the revenue flow to ever run the compnay...every analyst has downgraded it and it is facing certain doom...but somehow the longs here on SI know more than everyone else.. Its a pretty sorry state of affairs. Enjoy your cert campaign,,every squeeze ends ..dont forget that

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (12641)	5/12/2000 5:49:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29986

Gee, for a minute there, I thought the spooks were sorting through my SI PM writings etc because I have a whole list of '[ignored]' through this stream. If they aren't and they think I'm a criminal, they should be...get on with your job you layabouts...[if you are indeed real people as the allegedly real Carrie Lee who admits to working for WSJ.com claims you to be]. 'Ignored' included the post I'm replying to which people should NOT miss! Go back and read it again. I would have been very disappointed to miss it. I'd never 'ignored' anyone until recently and I now find I should not ignore the responses to those 'ignored' people. In fact, I'll probably just revert to never ignoring [other than mentally as I scan past stuff like Dweeb in the GGMDM stream]. So if you click 'ignore' it might be wise not to include replies to those ignorable posters. Thanks Jon for an excellent explanation of bonds. Which are impossible to understand though you did very well in explaining. Maurice PS: I notice that the WSJ has managed to harm investors by brazenly, right out there in the open, writing stuff about Globalstar in a negative way and including an alleged criminal conspiracy. The SEC should get onto that bunch and check out their stock positions when they write things. They appear to be using their power to manipulate markets by publishing distorted and incorrect statements as though they are fact. The WSJ and employees better not be trading in Globalstar stock. Interesting that they have edited out their libelous accusation that I was illegally trying to hurt investors. Though they seem very comfortable with the 'may be illegal'. Of course the WSJ could well be guilty of quite serious offences. They remind me of Linda Tripp, who was so thrilled to have a real piece of action she apparently and allegedly though I can't see why it should be illegal recorded conversations with Monica Lewinsky. She ends up in more trouble that the one they started off to attack. I hasten to add that the SEC will NOT find a stained blue dress in my wardrobe. Nor any illegal share dealings. With the share price DOWN today, they can't even say there was an opportunity to do any illegal trading. It's all been so out in the open that everyone who wants to can position their shorts, longs, stocks and we now have a much more informed market in Globalstar. Jim Black, thanks for the suggestion. I think it fair enough that they use my name, after all, this is all public. But lying about 'intending to damage investors' was a bit on the nose and implying criminal intent was not too pleasant either.