SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chic_hearne who wrote (31863)5/12/2000 1:09:00 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 64865
 
Yep, that's it. I don't know what you're talking about. And you don't seem willing to tell me, so like you say, "Whatever."



To: chic_hearne who wrote (31863)5/12/2000 1:51:00 AM
From: JC Jaros  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
You're boring (even for a chip enthusiast). --- OT: GW Bush - This candidate in an obvious pandering to old people is proposing TAX CREDITS for long term care of elderly relatives. What the hell?! These people don't need to have their lives extended! They're really old, obviously a burden, and have nothing to live for except getting older and becoming *more of a burden. And Bush wants to put INCENTIVES in place to EXTEND these old people? --- This is a two edged sword. First of all, they take money from SHAREHOLDERS (hello!) in *PRODUCTIVE* public corporations, people who have already put their parent's down and of course, public broadcasting. Then the old people live longer just to collect more Social Security and Medicare! --- Now I've got nothing against someone wanting to keep one or more of their parents alive. That's their choice. But, I don't think we should set up tax breaks to keep OLD PEOPLE voting Republican on absentee ballots. And don't think that's not a large part of this redistribution of wealth scheme. --- This is like the OPPOSITE of cutting Estate Taxes! <end_rant> -JCJ