Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (4988)	5/12/2000 3:23:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 9127

Welcome to the Eli n Gonz lez Posting Game. Please wipe the politics off your boots at the door, and be sure to procure parental permission before altering the nationality of the children. Thank you. Have a nice day. Cheers! -g-

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (4988)	5/12/2000 3:54:00 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 9127

Funniest thing I've read yet about this whole sorry ass saga. Thanks so much for posting it. And Mr. X says thanks too.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (4988)	5/12/2000 6:18:00 PM
From: Adelantado	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9127

From Yogi's postings it is apparent he has been playing the Elian game longer than most to the point where most folks would have passed out by now. Perhaps he should take a break and think a little before he posts more hateful expressions of intollerance under the guise of voicing anticastro theories and slogans. Perhaps a long rest to contemplate the how arrogant it is to claim that Castro's Cuba is so cruel while ignoring completely what the family did to Elian and his father. While he and other former Cubas reside in Florida expressing their continued desire to return to Cuba to liberate the people from communism, the fact is that most Cubans choose to remain in Cuba, live, work, play and die in Cuba albiet with Castro. If I were the father, I would sue the pants off the extended family for interference with the relationship he had with his son---its not only a crime in some states to unlawfully take or keep dependant children from their custodial parentbut also a cause of action for damages, and sue the pants off Yogi for his contined defamation of character of the father or does yogi think that he can slur the character of anyone just because he claims "freedom"?