SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Broadcom (BRCM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Keith A Walker who wrote (3886)5/12/2000 9:57:00 PM
From: Perry Ganz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6531
 
If my memory serves me right in 29 you only needed a dime to buy a dollar worth of stock today you need 50 cents.
that was a way back though, I could be wrong

for what its worth I think AG is market friendly after all this is where he came from

1/4 point & tightening bias

Perry



To: Keith A Walker who wrote (3886)5/12/2000 11:33:00 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6531
 
OT: I'll never understand why I discuss the FRB at BRCM. ;~))

Hi Keith,

Is this a broken record or what. Last time we started an FOMC discussion here (8/99), we ended up taking it to the India Coffee House thread. They didn't know what hit 'em... Heh,heh, heh.

I'll start it off here and if it gets too OT someone can suggest we move it to Voltaire's Porch. The discussion is already in full swing there. So to speak.

Now Keith, it is ungentlemanly for you to call the bankers that Greeenspan panders to "conspirators". Dude, the term is clients.

Re: this is the toughest call the Fed will have to make this year or maybe ever Well, yes and no. Yes to this year, the stock market could be crushed if they go 50 and say they want more. No, in the long run, in that there were far more consequential decisions to be made in 10/98, 4/94, 1981, 1970(the real oops, Burns going political on us and igniting the inflationary 70's) and of course during the original Big Kahuna.

Re: Any move like that would live in infamy as the "Revenge of the Republicans" After watching in astonishment that some Republican leaders are pissed that they only have 120 days to effectuate the goals of the "Committee to Re-Impeach the President", I believe these people are lunatic enough to do anything. Besides, it's alway Democrat scum that gets thrown out of the job market in the crunch, right? (Of course this is only because this class of Republican is totally clueless that there a tech revolution going on. They can't see it through the Confederate flag hanging in front of their unreconstructed country club.)

Re: The best and only book I have ever read about the Fed was "Secrets of the Temple" It is the best, and it seemingly is something that will have no sequel. Wm. Greider has moved on to other subjects. (I like that, he has a curious mind and he solved the banker issue.) What I took away from reading the book is that the FRB, the FOMC, the Chairman and the Board of Governors have only one purpose. That is to save bankers from suffering the normal consequences of the stupid mistakes they make on a cyclic basis, on average every three years. I have never been dissappointed by a lack of understanding of what the Fed is up to if I follow this simple precept. To be blunt, the FRB is designed to use the full faith and credit of [guess who?] to take care of the really dumb things that guys in banking do. Once I understood that, everything else was perfectly clear. The rest is window dressing. When it comes to thousand island dressing, you can count on the banker understanding three hundred and getting covered for the rest by what else? Full faith and croutons.

Re: The part which I think has already happened is the crash of 2000. What crash? What happened? Did I miss something? The U.S. equity markets were valued at $17Trillion in Dec. '99. Today the equity markets are valued at $17Trillion. What crash? What happened? Did I miss something?

Bon Chance, Le Faineant