Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w molloy who wrote (4278)	5/13/2000 4:38:00 AM
From: saukriver	Respond to of 5853

QCOM--response to FUD The CTO of AT&T wrote an article on the glories of TDMA in response to George Gilder's piece a week ago on Monday. It is dissected (actually disemboweled) on the New QCOM thread: Message 13705128 After you read this post, I would appreciate your thoughts on whether the author of this rebuttal knows what he is talking about. He appears to be quite knowledgeable. saukriver

To: w molloy who wrote (4278)	5/13/2000 4:04:00 PM
From: greedsgd_2000	Respond to of 5853

ITS THE FULL REPORT NOT THE "PICKS" THAT MATTER. I am sure you will be unable to fathom this, however, I will try again. Lets say you had a choice: Choice A: on the day the GTR came out, you received just the ticker symbol for the "pick", and you received it at precisely the same time as fund managers and every other subscriber accessing the GTR web site. However, you would never receive any substantive narration at any point even after a week, as you would only receive just the "pick" Choice B: you were forced to wait a week, and you would not know either directly or indirectly know about any Gilder "pick" for that entire week. However, at the end of the week, you would in fact receive the entire written report, including the "picks" and the substantive narration. Which is better A or B?