SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Traditional brokers/SEC conspiracy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wiselight who wrote (101)5/20/2000 10:45:00 PM
From: nick nelson  Respond to of 104
 
Support the SEC - STOP THE WALL STREET FRAUD!

Terry Savage, a syndicated columnist, is the author of The Savage Truth on Money (Wiley, 1999), a personal finance advice book combined with online resources.

MAY 17, 2000
Who's Hurt By More Disclosure? Not Investors

By Terry Savage

The Securities and Exchange Commission's proposed new rule, Regulation FD (full disclosure) would seem to be uncontroversial. The regulation requires public companies to make intentional disclosures available to all simultaneously. If a company official makes unintentional disclosure is made, public disclosure of that same information must be made promptly. Since the SEC does not have direct power over analysts, the burden falls on the public companies the agency regulates.


Individual investors appear delighted that the proposal would make them privy to companies' business or financial disclosures immediately: No longer would favored securities analysts get news or insights in advance of retail traders -- which isn't supposed to happen but, of course, does.

Not surprisingly, in a classic bit of Orwellian logic, the securities industry is loudly complaining that the proposed regulation would actually stifle the distribution of material information. After all, they argue, since a company is held responsible for compliance with the new rules, its managers' obvious reaction would be to simply stop giving any interviews to street analysts or fund managers (not to mention journalists).

This argument overlooks the fact that immediate distribution of financial information to all concerned is now not only possible, but is actually happening every day. Several websites, including www.bestcalls.com, www.vcall.com, www.StreetFusion.com and Yahoo Finance, already provide a free and open source for live conference calls that give the individual investor a chance to participate on an equal footing with the pros.

Most of these webcasts are not only transmitted live, but are available on demand for weeks after the initial broadcast. You can get schedules of upcoming conference calls with analysts, and even be notified by e-mail of upcoming events. Several sites post earnings reports immediately, and some specialize in hosting live events. According to StreetFusion, more than 1,600 companies have made earnings announcements on its online broadcast system this year, up from 200 last year.

Now, financial public relations professionals are using these websites to expand their services to corporate clients. Financial Relations Board/BSMG Worldwide (www.frbinc.com), a leading investor relations firm for startup technology companies, as well as some Old Economy companies, is hosting its Spring Virtual CEO Summit -- a four-day online event starting Monday, May 22nd.

Accessible through several of the Web sites mentioned above, the summit features at least 50 CEOs of companies ranging from Ingersoll-Rand and ServiceMaster to About.com and FTD.Com. All will be making live presentations, and taking questions from the online audience.

With both corporations and investors using technology to get the message out, what's Wall Street whining about? I remember distinctly Wall Street's reaction years ago when insurance analyst Ray Dirks told his best clients to get out of Equity Funding stock, because he suspected their earnings. Only later did he make his findings public in a report. By that time, Dirks's clients had unloaded their positions.

It made sense to me at the time. Dirks was doing his job -- well -- and probably deserved a bonus, instead of the public pillorying he got. (The U.S. Supreme Court backed Dirks in a landmark 1983 decision.)

That debate had real meaning in an era when analytical digging (instead of accepting company press releases) was the only way to get an investment edge. But we've come a long way in the last 20 years. Information is more easily accessible -- and in this new era of communications and the Internet, companies should be required to disclose fully, openly, and to all concerned at the same time.

Some companies are already taking advantage of technology to get ahead of Regulation FD. Finnish wireless provider Nokia uses its corporate website not only to demonstrate its products, but to keep investors fully informed. Corporate presentations and investor relations news is prominently highlighted on this website.

Regulation FD doesn't infringe on the "free speech" rights of either companies or the Street. If investors persist in second guessing the "guidance" of corporate executives, they can still turn to Web sites like www.whispernumbers.com or www.earningswhispers.com.

If analysts want to complain about the quality of earnings based on accounting techniques, they can still make headlines. And if executives either mislead investors or make egregious mistakes (as Proctor and Gamble did earlier this year), investors will punish them even more intensely.

That's what free markets are all about.
Terry Savage, a syndicated columnist, is the author of The Savage Truth on Money (Wiley, 1999), a personal finance advice book combined with online resources.
---

Kinda scarry, but the Net investor will make a difference this time... only Wall Street ANAL.ysts, and their trading desks, will screw-up the markets!

interactive.wsj.com



To: Wiselight who wrote (101)5/27/2000 4:03:00 AM
From: nick nelson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 104
 
Do Bailar & Burns really believe that investors and computers have trouble with DECIMALS? Tremendous volume last week... computers can't handle it? What happen to the 4 billion transactions a day the Nasdaq computers could handle just 6 months ago? The Wall Street Journal RAG line...

Copyright ¸ 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

May 26, 2000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nasdaq's Conversion to Quoting Stocks
In Decimals Could Cost $230 Million
By JUDITH BURNS
Dow Jones Newswires

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. stock markets' conversion to pricing stocks in decimals, rather than fractions, isn't coming cheap.

The Nasdaq Stock Market expects to spend as much as $130 million to convert its computer systems to quote prices in dollars and cents (rather than dollars and fractions), a senior official said Thursday.

"We've spent nearly $100 million already," and the conversion will probably wind up costing Nasdaq an additional $10 million to $30 million, said Gregor Bailar, an executive vice president and chief information officer for the National Association of Securities Dealers, Nasdaq's parent company. In a news briefing, Mr. Bailar said about half the spending thus far has been on computer hardware, with software and personnel costs accounting for the remainder.

Nasdaq Won't Block Decimal Trading by Other Stock Markets, NASD Says (May 19)

SEC Drops Plans for Decimal Trading in July, Seeks Comment on Alternatives (April 14)

NASD Says Nasdaq Will Be Ready for Decimalization by Early 2001 (April 3)

Despite the spending, Nasdaq's systems won't be able to accommodate decimal trading by July 3, the deadline ordered by the Securities and Exchange Commission in January. In March, Nasdaq announced that it lacked sufficient computer capacity to handle the switch. It has since pledged to be decimal-ready by April 2001.

Mr. Bailar said making the move to decimals this year would have been "imprudent" and attributed the delay to an unexpected surge in trading volume on the Nasdaq. "Nasdaq has seen exceptional volume growth," said Mr. Bailar, pointing to the record 2.8 billion shares that traded on the Nasdaq on April 4. Average daily volume for the first quarter of this year has been about two billion shares, he added, twice the rate for 1999. In addition, the growing number of small investors means the average transaction on Nasdaq is now for just 625 shares, far less than when institutional buyers dominated; all those tiny transactions generate much more computer-message traffic than large, block trades.

More message and transaction volume are putting unanticipated strains on Nasdaq's computers, including its "legacy" computer, a single Unisys system that can execute, report and confirm trades in decimals, but that still quotes bids, offers and prices in fractions.

With help from Unisys Corp., Blue Bell, Pa., Nasdaq managed to torque up the old system to expand its capacity. But Mr. Bailar said decimal conversion won't be complete until February.

While Nasdaq won't stand in the way of other U.S. stock markets' trading in decimals this year, Mr. Bailar said it doesn't favor that approach. "We think it's confusing for the public" to have some stocks priced in decimals and others in fractions, he said.

The New York Stock Exchange has said it is ready to convert to decimal trading this year. The SEC hasn't announced whether it will order U.S. markets other than Nasdaq to adopt decimal pricing this year, or limit decimal trading to a few listed stocks, in a pilot program.

An SEC spokesman said, "We are considering a variety of things and we have not decided on the path we will take." An announcement is expected in June.

Write to Judith Burns at judith.burns@dowjones.com
Copyright ¸ 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.