SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Russ who wrote (44782)5/13/2000 4:08:00 PM
From: mozek  Respond to of 74651
 
Thanks Russ. While I disagree with your conclusions, I find your post quite interesting and one that leaves me with some homework to do in order to satisfy my own curiosity.

Mike



To: Russ who wrote (44782)5/13/2000 4:25:00 PM
From: JC Jaros  Respond to of 74651
 
Nice post. -JCJ



To: Russ who wrote (44782)5/13/2000 4:43:00 PM
From: Daniel W. Koehler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
<<If Microsoft feels that the antitrust laws do not apply to them, I say Congress should pass a law specifically exempting Microsoft from both antitrust and copyright laws. We've got to keep the government out of the software industry completely, right?>>

Exactamundo, Yolanda. To paraphrase Samuel L. Jackson in "Pulp Fiction", "We gotta keep the muttaf*ckin' government out of the muttaf*ckin' software industry."

The copyright laws protects intellectual property, but hey Russ, (since we're all being ironical here), property is theft, right? And we don't need to repeal the laws, just go to court and sue. That's what we have the tort system. If you have a case, you will get an equitable remedy. And, it's not just Microsoft that benefits from the copyright laws.

That's just what MSFT is doing, seeking redress in the courts from incorrectly interpreted law. Your rhetoric sounds like you favor doing away with due process under the law and replacing it with social engineering and micromanagement of commerce by the Executive and Legislative branches.

Ciao, Daniel

PS. Another incognito flame artist, guys. Notice how these guys like to blow in and expect instant credibility without the courtesy of a profile.



To: Russ who wrote (44782)5/23/2000 2:12:00 AM
From: mozek  Respond to of 74651
 
Russ,
Just a followup on the licensing issue. As I understand the Office EULA, again without any legal expertise, Microsoft's licensing seems to allow for use of a single copy on both a stationary and laptop computer. It does seem to be a dated model, but also could be more broad in some circumstances than the "like a book" licensing approach.

Thanks,
Mike