SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Francisco Gold - FGX.V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nexus who wrote (824)5/13/2000 6:55:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1907
 
Nexus,

I can only say that TA is wrong sometimes.

The fact is that, despite technicals that are not yet bullish, FGX cannot move to $2-$3 because of the fundamentals that you know. The facts are also that PFG could easily move to $2-3 once the first drill results are published, despite positive intermediate term technical trend.

The reason is, as you said, that TA is a good gauge of investor sentiment though. But investor sentiment exist only when investor is watching. Here comes my argument that the intensity (or lack of) promotion and market exposure has a major effect on short term trends. This may cause the stock prices to temporarily be out of synch with the fundamentals.



To: Nexus who wrote (824)5/14/2000 9:35:00 AM
From: russwinter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1907
 
Nexus, in actuality chart technicals on gold (and gold stocks)versus the general stock market look extremely favorable towards gold and dire for the general market;

gold-eagle.com

Note the massive head and shoulder action in the general stock market. Gold stocks have recently popped out of a falling wedge in a classic chart action.