Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (110825)	5/14/2000 6:51:00 PM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578499

Pete, I would ask you the same questions if I was interested in that kind of dialogue. You may very well be a shoe salesman for all any one knows.<g>

To: pgerassi who wrote (110825)	5/14/2000 11:40:00 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578499

Pete, All in all, RDRAM has too low of a Benefit given its costs. At $560 per 128MB, SRAM would be cheaper (it usually costs about 3x DRAM cost but has higher performance) and better. That reminds me, long time ago when Dell Computer used to be called PC Limited, they sold this computer with SRAM instead of DRAM. It had only about 1 MB of memory, but it was faster than the competition using the same processor. I wonder why nobody uses this anymore in special cases, and instead, RDRAM is used, which doesn't really outperform SDRAM by much. Joe