SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (252)5/15/2000 4:49:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12465
 
Re: MGM combats fake message posted on Yahoo

MGM combats fake message posted on Yahoo
By Reuters

Special to CNET News.com
October 21, 1999, 9:20 a.m. PT

LOS ANGELES--In another warning sign for investors using the Internet, a bogus posting from someone claiming to be MGM's former chairman led the film studio to post a note warning investors to beware.

Late Tuesday, visitors to a Yahoo message board saw a note from someone using the name "frankgmancuso," advising shareholders to sell MGM stock ahead of a planned stock rights offering, which would eventually dilute the number of shares outstanding and place downward pressure on the stock price.

The bogus message pointed to MGM's stock drop of around 2 points Tuesday as evidence of shareholders starting to sell stock. But the rights had already started trading, and the falling stock price was primarily because of a technical adjustment after their issuance.

The real Frank G. Mancuso

Quote Snapshot

MGM 27.19 +0.12


Enter symbol:

ú Symbol Lookup
Quotes delayed 20+ minutes



resigned as MGM chairman and chief executive last spring, but he is still a consultant and member of its board. So a warning bell from Mancuso sounded a fairly ominous note for investors.

But Mancuso did not post the note. Investors quickly called his office, which then informed MGM. After consulting with attorneys, MGM posted a message using the name "mgmcorporate" warning investors that Mancuso was not the posting's source.

MGM said the message appeared to be from short sellers who were attempting to affect the stock price, and it warned that doing so was a violation of U.S. securities laws.

"Frankly, we had some reluctance in dignifying the message, but we felt the issue was serious enough to warrant our posting," said MGM senior vice president Craig Parsons.

A short seller borrows stock from a stockholder and then sells it, hoping the price will decline and the short seller can repay the borrowed shares at a lower price and pocket the difference.

As of last month, MGM had a fairly large short position of 3.7 million shares out of a total of roughly 15 million shares in public hands, according to MGM, meaning there were quite a few market players who wanted to see the stock fall.

The story may remind some stock watchers of last April's bogus posting on Yahoo concerning a southern California technology company called PairGain. In that case, a phantom message linked investors to what was purportedly a news story speculating that PairGain was a takeover target.

The bogus story sent PairGain shares soaring 31 percent before it was detected as false and yanked from the board by Yahoo. FBI agents traced the bogus message to a PairGain engineer, and he was arrested.

As a general rule, Yahoo does not comment on specific postings on message boards, a representative said. But it does offer a disclaimer on its message boards that the notes are opinions of people posting them, "are no substitute for your own research," and "should not be relied upon for trading."

Story Copyright¸ 1999 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved.

news.cnet.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (252)3/13/2001 11:23:30 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Re: 3/8/00 - [LU] WSJ: Jury Convicts Stock Trader For Fake Posting on Lucent

Jury Convicts Stock Trader
For Fake Posting on Lucent
By AARON ELSTEIN
WSJ.COM

A federal jury convicted an online stock trader of securities fraud for posting a fake news release that was designed to resemble a profit warning from Lucent Technologies Inc.

Thursday's ruling against Fred Moldofsky, a 44-year-old former dentist from Houston, appears to be the first time a jury has convicted someone of securities fraud for posting bogus information online.

Mr. Moldofsky, who was tried in Manhattan federal court, faces as many as 10 years in prison and a fine of at least $1 million. Sentencing by U.S. District Judge Robert P. Patterson Jr. is scheduled for June 11.

Mr. Moldofsky says he plans to appeal. His lawyers, who come from the public defender's office, had no comment, and federal prosecutors declined to comment on the jury's decision.

Mr. Moldofsky posted his fake press release, which appeared to come from Lucent, on the evening of March 22, 2000, on a Yahoo! Inc. message board. The message said the Murray Hill, N.J., company expected earnings to fall short of expectations in that year's second quarter.

Lucent's stock, one of the most widely held in the country at the time, initially fell 3.6% following the release. The morning's decline wiped out nearly $7.1 billion of market value before word came that same day that the release was fake, prosecutors said, and the stock recovered.

Mr. Moldofsky's lawyers, who presented no witnesses at trial, didn't dispute that their client posted the message. But they contended that he didn't intend to profit from any fall in Lucent shares because he hadn't shorted the stock. They added that if he had intended to defraud investors, he wouldn't have posted a message when the market was closed, when investors had time to verify the inaccurate information.

Posting the message "was a dumb thing to do. It was stupid. But it wasn't a crime," Mr. Moldofsky's lawyer, Ian Yankwitt, told jurors.

Want to receive an e-mail alert when Heard on the Net columns are published? See the E-Mail Setup page for details on how to subscribe.

But Steven Peikin, an assistant U.S. attorney who led the prosecution, told the jury that whether or not Mr. Moldofsky succeeded in fooling investors didn't matter. The important thing was that he had tried to fool them, Mr. Peikin said.

And that's the argument the jury bought. After a week-long trial, it took the seven-man, five-woman jury three hours to reach a ruling. "We decided the whole thing came down to intent," said Carolyn Stoller, an advertising representative who served as the jury's foreman. "If we hadn't agreed on that, we would have spent a long time arguing."

Although others have been accused of posting false press releases on the Internet about such companies as Emulex Corp. and PairGain Technologies Inc., those cases never got to trial because the defendants pleaded guilty to fraud charges. Mr. Moldofsky's securities-fraud case was the first to be tried in court, said Blake Bell, a New York lawyer who tracks online-securities litigation.

"It's not guaranteed that Mr. Moldofsky will go to jail, because his lawyers can still try to make a deal with the prosecutors before he's sentenced," Mr. Bell said. "But I have no doubt that the prosecutors will be trying to make an example of him."

Mr. Moldofsky's conviction came on the same day that federal securities regulators settled a civil fraud case against Yun Soo Oh Park, a New York burrito vendor-turned-online stock picker better known as "Tokyo Joe." Mr. Park agreed to return about $755,000 in profits for failing to disclose that he sold stocks he was recommending others buy.

Mr. Moldofsky actively traded stocks using an account at Datek Online Holdings Corp., according to court records. He frequently sold tech stocks the same day he bought them and bought many stocks on margin, meaning he used borrowed money.

On March 22, 2000, the day Mr. Moldofsky posted the fraudulent messages about Lucent, he bought and sold 6,000 Lucent shares for a net loss in the transactions, according to prosecutors, who never quantified the loss.

Prosecutors say he posted 19 messages about Lucent on Yahoo the evening of March 22 and the morning of March 23, suggesting that Lucent would warn of an earnings shortfall. The telecommunications giant had already warned Jan. 6, saying quarterly earnings wouldn't meet expectations.

Prosecutors said Mr. Moldofsky attempted to exploit investor unease about Lucent by posting messages under various aliases on the evening of March 22, saying, for example, "Lucent Releases Earnings Warning! Damn!"

The message was identified as a "Company Press Release," datelined Murray Hill, N.J., and purportedly from PRNewswire, the service that disseminates actual Lucent news releases. The bogus release said the company expected second-quarter earnings to fall short of consensus estimates. The release also quoted the company's chairman at the time, Richard McGinn, as saying he was disappointed with the results.

Lee Mikles, a hedge-fund manager at Mikles Miller Management Inc. in Los Angeles, testified that an analyst showed him the release, believing it to be real. Mr. Mikles said he then sold short 50,000 Lucent shares. (Short sellers profit from falling stock prices by selling borrowed shares that they hope to replace later with stock bought at a lower price.)

But at 11:32 a.m. on March 23, Bloomberg News reported that the alleged Lucent earnings warning was fake, and the stock shot up 6.8% in minutes, according to court documents. Mr. Mikles testified that the news forced him to immediately cover his short position for a loss of $200,000.

In addition to the criminal conviction, Mr. Moldofsky faces a civil suit from the Securities and Exchange Commission on similar allegations.

He says he spent much of his time out of court this week in an Internet cafe in Times Square, scouring such message-board sites as Silicon Investor and Raging Bull. He says he wants to find people willing to testify that they knew about the Yahoo message but didn't change their investment decisions. "There's gotta be someone out there who can help me," he said. "Gotta be."

Write to Aaron Elstein at aaron.elstein@wsj.com

interactive.wsj.com