SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Bishop who wrote (46960)5/15/2000 6:08:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
ATF.V

stockhouse.ca

Alternate Fuel Systems has recently announced a new partnership with California-based Clean Air
Partners as well as new market opportunities with Cummins Engine. With projections of
skyrocketing gross margins and $20 share price, ATF has launched a new front as they compete with
Westport Innovations in the war of the alternate fuel sector.

Toronto, ONT, May 12 /SHfn/ -- It's been nearly nine months since John Anderson joined Calgary-based Alternate Fuel
Systems Inc. [V.ATF] as the company's new President and CEO. Since that time, ATF has made a number of high profile
executive appointments as well as building up its technology division with several new scientific officers. Having closed one
recent financing for $5.7 million and cancelling another for $8 million, ATF will soon be returning to the Street for more
capital as they look to finance a massive expansion strategy. With a fresh alliance with Clean Air Partners that will open the American market, as well as new deals in Iran,
the UK and opportunities in the US with Cummins Engine, ATF has set it's sights on winning the battle of the alternate fuel players.

On April 6, ATF announced the appointment of Walter Brooks to its Board of Directors. Brooks has been with General Motors Canada
[T.GM] for 37 years and according to Anderson, will become key as ATF pushes its duel fuel technology in the North American market.
Brooks has been intimately involved with introducing the Isuzu [ISUZF] Duramax 6600 V-8 engine into that market. Anderson sees the
Duramax engine as the future of duel fuel system engines, "I would project that the Duramax is going to gain about 4 or 5% market share
(North America) and will take the world by storm." Anderson ads, "That engine has Ford terrified and rightfully so."

Vancouver, BC-based Westport Innovations [T.WPT] is largely considered the closest competitor to ATF in terms of alternate fuel injection technology. Westport
currently has a working alliance with Ford [F] to develop the enabling technologies for a natural gas- fuelled diesel engine for light-duty vehicles. To date, Westport and ATF
haven't had the chance to go head to head in the marketplace with their technology as WPT has yet to bring a product to market. If Westport is able to develop a system
for the Ford diesel engine, they may get their chance, competing directly with the Isuzu engine.

It is expected GM will debut the all-new direct-injection diesel engine in the 2001 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra heavy-duty full-size pickup trucks. ATF currently has
its Eagle diesel dual fuel system running in an Isuzu 7.5 tonne truck in the UK, done in conjunction with Isuzu Truck (UK) Limited. Depending on the overall success of that
program, Isuzu UK will consider rolling out the Eagle/Isuzu truck throughout the country. Anderson foresees tremendous benefit to the company as the newly equipped
Isuzu tours the UK. "I'm expecting an order for about 75 systems for Britain," which could merely be a stepping stone for Isuzu North America where Brooks has
considerable influence.

ATF is currently in negotiations with Cummins Engine [CUM], the world's largest producer of diesel engines above 200Hp, in an effort to
build on a relationship that has already been well established between the two companies' in the UK market. Ernestine Chan, an analyst
with Vancouver-based Golden Capital sees great potential in the Cummins alliance, "They will be able to use their experience through
international contracts to expand into the US market." Two years ago, ATF put its Eagle system in a Cummins engine and today have 40
trucks in the UK running on a Cummins B-1 engine using ATF technology. That relationship has now been focused on the US, where ATF is
in talks with suppliers to develop an OEM relationship for Cummins. Westport has also been working with Cummins but as far as any
perceived exclusivity with Cummins, Anderson dispels that belief; "We talk to people in Cummins and they tell us this is strictly a research
project with Westport." Anderson says Cummins has assured ATF, "We're not going into production with this (Westport) thing." As the battle over actual contracts with
Cummins develops, ATF is building on their existing relationship with the diesel engine giant that could push them into the US market.

California-based Clean Air Partners have had a long standing relationship with ATF that dates back to 1993 when they signed a joint product development and distribution
agreement. That agreement was not so much of an agreement as an understanding, essentially stipulating the two would agree to stay out of each other's markets. Clean
Air had an existing relationship with Caterpillar [CAT] as its sole client in the US, and ATF was left with the rest of the globe to market its injector technology. On March
27, the two companies rescinded that agreement which now opens the door to a cooperative agreement for the US market. Anderson has even spoken of the two entities
merging at some point in the future. One area that has been identified as the largest single area of untapped growth for ATF is the stationary power generation market. Both
Clean Air and ATF plan on tackling this opportunity having identified a market of over 37,000 sites such as hospitals and institutions that use diesel generators.

Currently ATF has two patents covering both its flagship product Eagle, as well as the Condor. The Eagle system is in operation in the field with busses in Thailand and
Australia as well as the recent Isuzu partnership in the UK. The Eagle system is a hybrid fuel system designed to allow diesel engines to operate using natural gas while
maintaining the power and performance of a full diesel engine. The Condor Reverse Flow Catalytic Converter is described by Anderson as, "the best after treatment,
methane- destroying catalytic technology in the world." Currently being tested in Germany in a Volkswagen engine, ATF expects to get the results of that trial later this
month. As well, Anderson hinted the US military has expressed an interest in the Condor for field operations. ATF also has the Sparrow that is a single fuel compressed
natural gas system.

On April 10, ATF announced an alliance with IDEM (Iranian Diesel Manufacturing Company), which is 30% owned by DaimlerChrysler
[DCX]. The alliance represents the first OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) contract for ATF and calls for the partners to work together
to design modifications for a Mercedes diesel engine, dedicated to operate on 100% natural gas. The agreement includes a purchase
schedule for 2000 Sparrow units to be delivered before year end 2001. The company currently has ATF personnel on the IDEM assembly
line installing the units. Asked if ATF would have problems meeting its contractual obligations, Anderson indicated that it would be a
challenge for the relatively small staff, which he counts at less than 20, to deliver the product on time but is actively in the process of
ramping up staff. By the end of the year, Anderson expects that in addition to moving into a new manufacturing facility it is expected his
staff will double as well.

Part of the problems facing ATF today, and Anderson is the first to admit it, is that in the past, former CEO and company founder, Gerhard Klopp, regularly issued press
releases announcing massive deals that often failed to materialize. "There was a lot of exaggeration in those announcements and that's what we're paying for today
because the company has lost a lot of credibility," says Anderson with a refreshingly matter-of-fact tone. Asked about one specific deal announced by Klopp back in March
1998, regarding a Mexican contract for a reported 10,000 ATF conversion systems which would reportedly bring ATF $200 million in revenues, Anderson sighs and says,
"The company could never have followed through delivering 10,000 of anything back then." ATF has installed to date about 300 of the 1000 units that were actually sold for
that Mexican contract. Klopp, who was asked to leave his post as CEO, is currently listed on the company's site as a Director, yet Anderson indicated his direct
involvement is limited and that the company is currently in negotiations as to Klopp's future relationship with the company. With new management and a fresh focus,
Anderson is determined to turn things around for the company.

As far as the obvious competitive comparisons between ATF and Westport, Anderson sees a market that places great value in Westport
stock (currently trading just over $12, well off its high in February of $26.40) "[Westport] is like a race horse that's come out of the gate in
the right direction, never stumbled, raised money consistently," but as Anderson can't help to point out, "never sold anything." The irony
definitely isn't lost on Anderson whose own share price languishes at $1.25, off its February high of $4.70.

However, Anderson optimistically boasts, like a man who knows the outcome of the final act, "But that's all ok, because we're going to prove
that the little company is going to be the winner." Ernestine Chan, an analyst with Vancouver-based Golden Capital follows ATF and sees
great potential in the stock moving forward, "ATF is relatively undervalued with products that have been on the market for a few years." Chan
believes the stock should be trading in the $3 to $4 range based on 1999 revenues of $3.5 million. Anderson is projecting 2000 revenues of
$6 million.

On January 24, 2000, ATF announced a proposed $5 million financing to be underwritten by Calgary's Acumen Capital. At the time of the announcement, Laurel de
Yturralde, who followed ATF for the Bidding On Bay Street newsletter, announced she was dropping coverage of ATF. In her mind, the financing was a bad deal for
shareholders, as the placement would swell the float by over 7 million shares. (Currently there are about 36 million shares outstanding) What was particularly interesting
from a competitive perspective is what Yturralde wrote in her last report to subscribers, "With Westport trading at $5 and nowhere near ATF in terms of product
development, principals at Acumen must know full well this financing is undervalued." That financing closed on March 29 for gross proceeds of $5.8 million.

A subsequent ATF press release on March 30 announced the cancellation of a second planned financing through Acumen and Octagon Capital for what was supposed to
be an $8 million round. In the release, Anderson stated, "We believe the actual value of the company is much higher than what the market is currently reflecting in share
price, and as such a financing at this time, is not in the best interests of shareholders". What had happened at the time, as Anderson explained to StockHouse, was that
with the March market downturn, Acumen would no longer give ATF the original $3 per special warrant as set out in the March 6 press release and were instead offering
$2 which Anderson rejected as unacceptable. Anderson now admits he'll have to return to the Street for a new round of financing within 10 months. With $3 million in the
bank, Anderson sees that cash as enough to get them through the year.

For the next round, ATF isn't likely to go with Acumen Capital again. Anderson was pushing for institutional investors throughout the first
financing, while Acumen was filling its own retail orders and the placement ended up being nearly 50% retail. "What [Acumen] tried to do is
get their clients into cheap deals, I mean that's what they do so we don't want to do that again," said Anderson looking ahead to the next
round. ATF is currently looking at Octagon, as well as Golden Capital playing a more central role in the next financing.

Westport and ATF operate in the same alternate fuel sector, yet ATF's rich cousin, in the eyes of the investing public, has yet to prove itself
in the one area that truly matters; product in the field. However, to the investing public, Anderson understands that perception is a large part
of the game; "You've got to remember that our closest competitor is sitting with 100 people, $40 million, 60,000 square feet and not a sale in
sight." Whereas with ATF, Anderson is supporting technology in eight countries with a stock under $2 and less than 25 staff, "It's the
complete antithesis of Westport," says Anderson. When the CEO took over the helm at ATF back in August, the company was literally
insolvent and Anderson ran it for the first 8 months, until the financing in March, on sales alone. At the time, Anderson doubled the price of ATF products reflecting huge
increases in margins. As a result, Anderson predicts, "You're going to see our gross margins skyrocket this year." Without giving a specific timeline, Anderson tells
StockHouse he sees ATF as a $20 stock.

Anderson sees the ATF dual-fuel injection system as really the only choice for the diesel engine manufacturers. In referring to the Westport High Pressure Direct Injection
(HPDI) technology, which is still a dual-fuel system but administered through a single injection unit incorporating both diesel and natural gas, Anderson sees the system as
wrought with complications and maintenance requirements once in actual use in the field. He views the two injection systems, which are similar in design, as completely
different in functionality. Both systems inject diesel and natural gas into the diesel engine; the difference lies in how the injection is delivered and regulated. The ATF
system injects the gas and diesel into the cylinder head separately and then gas is injected into the manifold, which Anderson insists is much easier to control. With the
Westport system, the gas and diesel are injected nearly simultaneously through the injector port, which Anderson says is both difficult to regulate and in actual application
won't function nearly as well.

For the Westport technology, Anderson questions the reliability once in the field, "In a single injection system, you have to control the
injection of the diesel and the gas to less than a millisecond and if you get it wrong, you flame out the gas ignition." Anderson doesn't see
the Westport single injector as the way of the future, "It's not an easy thing to do through a single injector and frankly it's not one that
Caterpillar, Mitsubishi [MSBHY] Isuzu or anyone else in the world is doing and certainly not the way the diesel engine is going, which is
more the way of the Duramax." Anderson and ATF are hopeful the partnership with Isuzu and the Duramax engine proves to be a fruitful one
in the diesel engine market. Speculating on the potential for future market acceptance of the Westport injectors, Anderson remains
skeptical; "Once their super-duper fuel injector is finished, it's going to have to be made for $20 and you're going to be making about $2 on it because that's how Ford or
any of them work." As Anderson sees it, "You can't make money on a spark plug."

Anderson is convinced that with the right partners such as Clean Air and Cummins, together with a ramping up of staff and production facilities, the new ATF will be seen
as a real player with real product in the alternate fuel sector. Anderson speculates as to ATF's future, "I'm going to build the company in value and two things will happen.
Either we'll be bought out, which is probably what will happen, or we'll just keep in and finally be profitable." Investors are hoping profitability comes sooner than later.



To: Jim Bishop who wrote (46960)5/15/2000 6:32:00 PM
From: dreamer  Respond to of 150070
 
This thread is always HOT and when the volume returns to the market I'm sure it will sizzle!



To: Jim Bishop who wrote (46960)5/15/2000 6:46:00 PM
From: StocksDATsoar  Respond to of 150070
 
I think this is what's causing all the excitement in ATHM.

Comcast President Interested in AT&T's Excite Stake


New Orleans, May 9 (Bloomberg) -- Comcast Corp. President Brian Roberts said he would be willing to acquire AT&T Corp.'s 56 percent voting stake in Excite At Home Corp. to gain control of the provider of fast Internet service on cable lines. Excite At Home's shares rose 14 percent.

Such an acquisition would replace an agreement for Comcast and Cox Communications Inc. to sell 60 million Excite shares to AT&T at $48 each, or about $3 billion. That plan, worked out in March, would boost AT&T's voting stake in Excite to 74 percent.

``If you want to flip the deal, we'd buy it,'' Roberts said at the National Cable Television Association's annual meeting in New Orleans. ``Controlling that asset is very strategic to building your network.'' He didn't say more about his plans.

Comcast, the No. 3 U.S. cable-TV provider, and its rivals are spending billions of dollars to upgrade their networks for high- speed online connections, hundreds of TV channels and other new services. Excite At Home, based in Redwood City, California, is the largest U.S. provider of fast Internet service on cable.

Comcast and Excite At Home said Comcast hadn't made the bid Roberts suggested.

AT&T is the largest U.S. long-distance telephone company and will become the No. 1 U.S. cable television provider after completing its acquisition of MediaOne Group Inc.

Shares of Excite rose 2 7/16 to 19 15/16 on the Nasdaq Stock Market after reaching 28, a 60 percent increase. It was the second most-active stock in U.S. trading. Shares of Philadelphia-based Comcast rose 11/16 to 33 1/16 on the Nasdaq. AT&T, based in New York, rose 5/8 to 37 5/8 on the New York Stock Exchange.

May/09/2000 16:51 GMT

For more stories from Bloomberg News, click here.

(C) Copyright 2000 Bloomberg L.P.



To: Jim Bishop who wrote (46960)5/15/2000 6:57:00 PM
From: StocksDATsoar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
WOW, look what I found on ATHM....Glad I loaded de boat with RG today..;-)))))))

Taking Excite@Home's Pulse

By David Gardner
May 9, 2000

Before we begin today's recap -- the first of a two-part series -- let me give you my heartiest plug for a good read of yesterday's recap, if you haven't yet read it. Paul Commins encourages us all to abandon the phrase "buy and hold," and comes up with a new term we can use to describe the way most Fools invest.

In the past I have used my preferred alternative phrase -- "buy-TO-hold" -- to show that as an investor I purchase a stock in order to become a part owner of a company, and I hope to be one for the foreseeable future. Paul's phrase, which is at least as useful as "buy-to-hold," is well worth reading, considering, and ultimately (I think) using. I won't give it away here, though, because it deserves his Foolish explanation.

It is either human nature or it is my nature -- take your pick -- to tend to focus on what is doing well for us, and notice less what is NOT doing well. From an emotional standpoint, most of us maintain healthy attitudes by accentuating the positives and tending to forget the pain and sadness of the past.

I think it's fair to say that this element of human nature, or my nature -- take your pick -- is visible in the coverage we give to our Rule Breaker entrants in this space each day. I know I've spent a lot more time writing about AOL, Celera, and Amazon than I have spent on Excite@Home, for instance. And in the past, we'd have dog stocks (ATC Communications) which would rate barely a mention for a month or more.

Are we "hiding" our mistakes? Certainly not -- it's all right there in the black-and-white of the numbers appended to every single daily portfolio recap we've ever written. Available to the public's eye and scrutiny, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Rather, what is happening with our coverage is one part emotional (as I have pointed out) and one part rational. What's the rational part? Quite meaningful, and easily communicated: The more a given stock declines, the less it represents of one's assets. And the more a given stock rises, the MORE it represents of one's assets. America Online and Amazon.com represent 34% and 22% of our portfolio, respectively. Excite@Home is 3%.

OK, so 34 plus 22 equals 56. And 56 is over 18 times more than three. So, for every 18 mentions of AOL and Amazon.com, Excite@Home proportionally rates just a single mention. That probably about mirrors the attention given these various companies in past recaps....

But obviously, we DO believe in learning from our mistakes and we do NOT shy away from letting people know we make them. In fact, we say this frequently, and shall continue to do so. As long as we invest in dogs, you'll be able to see them yap.

And because I have not written about Excite@Home (Nasdaq: ATHM) in recent memory, I want to devote space to it today and tomorrow to do a general checkup. And this is timely, because while the Nasdaq skidded another 2.3% today, for some strange reason, Excite@Home rose 14% -- and at one point today it was up 56%! Whoa... what happened? And, is that why I'm talking about it today? Just because it's up? Heck no. Check out these numbers:

Since we've held Excite@Home...

Excite@Home -29%
S&P 500 +23%

This has been a very poor investment, since our December '98 purchase of what was then called just "@Home." Here's a look at the two-year chart. See how it went up to $100? See Fool make money? See Fool lose profits? See Fool lose money? Run, Spot, run.

So what's up with Excite@Home? Well, today we'll look at what has just happened. Tomorrow we'll look more at future implications.

Excite@Home's shares shot up today after Comcast stated publicly that it would be willing to "flip" its agreement with AT&T. You'll recall that AT&T restructured its arrangement with fellow Excite@Home participants Cox and Comcast (both AT&T cable competitors). Rather than allow those companies veto power over Excite@Home's moves, AT&T restructured to allow Cox and Comcast either to buy larger chunks of the company (forgoing control), OR to sell their shares back to AT&T for a price of $48 per share.

Today, Comcast proposed the idea of a different deal. "If AT&T would allow it," Comcast effectively said, "we'll buy THEIR interest in At Home for $48 a share." Given that the stock closed yesterday below $18, zoom-uh-zoom-uh-zoom. Within an hour, the shares had shot up to $28 before selling off over the course of the afternoon to their close just below $20. That was still a 14% gain. Meanwhile, earlier this morning, a Prudential analyst reiterated a BUY rating with a target price -- not of $48 -- but of $80.

It's easy to get caught up in the short term. But for a better look at the intermediate-to-longer-term prospects for the company, what I suggest for starters is to go to the "Best Of" feature of our discussion boards and use that screen to find the 5 most recommended posts of the past couple of months. The results are on this screen. If you take the time to then click in and read each one, you find yourself immediately more educated and sophisticated about your thinking on Excite@Home beyond just Comcast's latest rumor/bid.

Indeed, in preparation for tomorrow's report, and/or if you own shares in the company or are considering it as an investment, I insist you DO read those 5 postings, because they will tell you a lot more in the time that you read them than I have space and time, here. The value I will add tomorrow is to try to boil it all down into a few truths that we can learn from. But inevitably, some very good stuff is lost in the vapor, as I boil Excite@Home down.

But for now, I will leave you with this primary thought: The market hates uncertainty. It's as true for ATHM stock as it is for any uncertain prospect in any uncertain industry. And Excite@Home has some gunmetal-gray clouds hanging over it. The issue of closed versus open access, mired in the courts, remains critical; will AT&T and other cable operators be forced to allow others the use of AT&T cable lines to do competitive business?

Playing into that uncertainty, the company's most recent quarter showed red ink at the bottom line, one cent per share of losses. This was following a profitable quarter, and many had expected Excite@Home to show another profit (though, granted, consistent profitability is not expected until 2002). Anytime you have a jittery external situation (with government intervention possible, and a bunch of large players with their hands in the piggy bank), and then you compound it with a shortfall quarter, the market is REALLY not going to be happy.

The hope for Excite@Home shareholders (a group in which we continue to number ourselves) is that the company continues to fulfill on its long-term plan to become the dominant "full-service online broadband company." Or how about: a dominant one? Excite@Home does not have to "win it all" in order to improve on its present market cap of $7.7 billion.

But more of that, for tomorrow. And if, by the way, you have a specific question you'd like me to address or point for me to consider, drop by our Excite@Home discussion board, which I'll fully peruse tonight. Fool on!

David Gardner