SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis Roth who wrote (10225)5/16/2000 1:14:00 PM
From: Valueman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Ouch! If I was an AWE shareholder(when a flying pig floats over a frozen hell), this statement would bother me to no end. Anyone with common sense would not utter such a phrase.

At a recent Universal Wireless Communications Consortium (Redmond,
Wash.) conference espousing the virtues of Edge, AT&T chief technical
officer David Nagel argued that although Edge may not be the fastest
technology available, it is by far the most economically viable strategy
for taking advantage of AT&T's existing infrastructure. "This is not an
issue of which technology is better. TDMA-Edge crosses the quality
boundary. It is enough better," said Nagel.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (10225)5/17/2000 1:02:00 AM
From: JGoren  Respond to of 13582
 
Pretty Shocking: "This is not an issue of which technology is better. TDMA-Edge crosses the quality boundary. It is enough better," said Nagel.

Has anyone heard of a technology company in the last decade say something like this? Not much regard for the wisdom of the consuming public. Every tech company I have heard of, emphasizes that its product or service is the best, most advanced, etc., even if it's not.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News